Skip to content

Add Post-Task Reflection and Study Debrief screens#22

Merged
hashexplaindata merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
feature/post-task-reflection-debrief-299720326020795727
Mar 13, 2026
Merged

Add Post-Task Reflection and Study Debrief screens#22
hashexplaindata merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
feature/post-task-reflection-debrief-299720326020795727

Conversation

@hashexplaindata
Copy link
Owner

Added Post-Task Reflection and Study Debrief screens. Modified routing in code/experiment.js to ensure data is transmitted only after the participant provides informed consent through the new debrief flow. Added the crucial manipulation_noticed metric to telemetry.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 299720326020795727 started by @hashexplaindata

- Added `#screen-manipulation` and `#screen-debrief` to index.html before the outro screen.
- Modified `code/experiment.js` to route through the new screens before executing the batch payload.
- Appended `manipulation_noticed` to `STATE.results` for every trial row.

Co-authored-by: hashexplaindata <221828969+hashexplaindata@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings March 13, 2026 00:12
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the experiment's participant experience and data integrity by introducing a structured post-task reflection and a transparent debriefing process. These additions ensure ethical data collection by obtaining informed consent after revealing the study's true purpose, while also capturing a key metric on participant awareness of experimental conditions.

Highlights

  • New User Flow Screens: Added dedicated screens for 'Post-Task Reflection' and 'Study Debriefing' to guide participants through the final stages of the experiment.
  • Data Transmission Control: Modified the experiment's routing logic to ensure that participant data is securely transmitted only after explicit informed consent is provided through the new debriefing flow.
  • New Telemetry Metric: Introduced a crucial manipulation_noticed metric to the experiment's state and telemetry, capturing whether participants noticed specific experimental manipulations.
Changelog
  • code/experiment.js
    • Added manipulation_noticed property to the global STATE object.
    • Updated the finalization button's event listener to transition to the new 'manipulation' screen.
    • Implemented new event listeners for manipulation check buttons to record participant responses and append the manipulation_noticed metric to all trial data.
    • Modified the data submission flow to occur only after the debrief screen, emphasizing informed consent.
  • code/index.html
    • Added a new HTML section for the 'Post-Task Reflection' screen, including a question and response buttons.
    • Added a new HTML section for the 'Study Debriefing' screen, providing an explanation of the study's true purpose and a final submission button.
Activity
  • PR created automatically by Jules for task 299720326020795727, started by @hashexplaindata.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds new post-task reflection and study debrief screens, and updates the experiment flow to only transmit data after the debrief. The changes are logical and implement the described functionality. My review includes a few suggestions to improve code quality and maintainability. In experiment.js, I've suggested a small refactoring to centralize data enrichment logic and to follow best practices with parseInt. In index.html, I've recommended moving inline styles to the external stylesheet to maintain consistency and separation of concerns. These changes will make the code cleaner and easier to manage in the future.

// Route: Manipulation Check -> Debrief
document.querySelectorAll('.btn-manipulation').forEach(btn => {
btn.addEventListener('click', (e) => {
STATE.manipulation_noticed = parseInt(e.target.dataset.val);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

It is a best practice to always specify the radix (the base in mathematical numeral systems) when using parseInt to prevent unexpected behavior and ensure clarity. For parsing a decimal number, please add 10 as the second argument.

Suggested change
STATE.manipulation_noticed = parseInt(e.target.dataset.val);
STATE.manipulation_noticed = parseInt(e.target.dataset.val, 10);

Comment on lines +391 to +394
// Append this crucial metric to every trial row before sending
STATE.results.forEach(row => {
row.manipulation_noticed = STATE.manipulation_noticed;
});

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

For better code organization, the logic to append manipulation_noticed to each result should be moved into the executeBatchPayload function. This would consolidate all final data enrichment in one place, as is already done for semantic_justification. Please remove this loop and add row.manipulation_noticed = STATE.manipulation_noticed; inside the forEach loop in executeBatchPayload.

Comment on lines +115 to +136
<div id="screen-manipulation" class="screen hidden">
<div class="card">
<h2 style="margin-bottom: 10px;">Post-Task Reflection</h2>
<p style="color: var(--text-secondary); margin-bottom: 25px;">During the UI evaluation, did you notice any specific labels, badges, or recommendations attached to the design options?</p>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; gap: 10px;">
<button class="btn-primary btn-manipulation" data-val="1">Yes, I noticed an "AI Recommended" badge</button>
<button class="btn-primary btn-manipulation" data-val="2">I noticed other text/labels (e.g., "Open for Fall")</button>
<button class="btn-primary btn-manipulation" data-val="0">No, I did not notice any specific badges</button>
</div>
</div>
</div>

<div id="screen-debrief" class="screen hidden">
<div class="card" style="text-align: left;">
<h2 style="margin-bottom: 15px;">Study Debriefing</h2>
<p style="margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong>Thank you for your participation.</strong></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 10px; font-size: 0.9rem; line-height: 1.5; color: var(--text-secondary);">The true purpose of this study was not to test beta UI designs for a university portal. We are investigating <em>informational influence</em>—specifically, whether the presence of an "AI Recommended" badge alters human decision-making and cognitive processing time when faced with ambiguous choices.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 10px; font-size: 0.9rem; line-height: 1.5; color: var(--text-secondary);">Because knowing this beforehand would have changed your natural behavior, we could not disclose it until now. Your data remains completely anonymous and will be used strictly for academic research.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 20px; font-size: 0.9rem; line-height: 1.5; color: var(--text-secondary);">If you consent to submit your data now that you know the true purpose, please click "Submit & Finish" below. If you wish to withdraw, you may simply close this tab.</p>
<button id="btn-submit-final" class="btn-primary" style="width: 100%;">Submit & Finish</button>
</div>
</div>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The newly added screens screen-manipulation and screen-debrief use a significant amount of inline styling. This is inconsistent with other static screens in this file (e.g., screen-9) which use CSS classes for styling. To improve maintainability, consistency, and separation of concerns, please move these inline styles to the style.css file and apply them via CSS classes.

@hashexplaindata hashexplaindata merged commit d8a2d0b into master Mar 13, 2026
4 checks passed
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds a post-task reflection (manipulation check) and a debrief/consent step at the end of the experiment, and updates the experiment flow so telemetry is only uploaded after the participant explicitly submits at the debrief screen.

Changes:

  • Added new “Post-Task Reflection” and “Study Debriefing” screens to the end-of-flow UI.
  • Updated routing in init() so “Complete Diagnostic” goes to manipulation check → debrief → submit, and only then executes the batch upload.
  • Added a new telemetry metric (manipulation_noticed) and propagates it onto trial rows.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

File Description
code/index.html Adds the new manipulation check and debrief screens, including the final submit button used to trigger upload.
code/experiment.js Adds manipulation_noticed to state and wires new end-of-study routing so upload is deferred until debrief submission.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review. Take the survey.

Comment on lines +115 to +122
<div id="screen-manipulation" class="screen hidden">
<div class="card">
<h2 style="margin-bottom: 10px;">Post-Task Reflection</h2>
<p style="color: var(--text-secondary); margin-bottom: 25px;">During the UI evaluation, did you notice any specific labels, badges, or recommendations attached to the design options?</p>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; gap: 10px;">
<button class="btn-primary btn-manipulation" data-val="1">Yes, I noticed an "AI Recommended" badge</button>
<button class="btn-primary btn-manipulation" data-val="2">I noticed other text/labels (e.g., "Open for Fall")</button>
<button class="btn-primary btn-manipulation" data-val="0">No, I did not notice any specific badges</button>
Comment on lines +128 to +134
<div class="card" style="text-align: left;">
<h2 style="margin-bottom: 15px;">Study Debriefing</h2>
<p style="margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong>Thank you for your participation.</strong></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 10px; font-size: 0.9rem; line-height: 1.5; color: var(--text-secondary);">The true purpose of this study was not to test beta UI designs for a university portal. We are investigating <em>informational influence</em>—specifically, whether the presence of an "AI Recommended" badge alters human decision-making and cognitive processing time when faced with ambiguous choices.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 10px; font-size: 0.9rem; line-height: 1.5; color: var(--text-secondary);">Because knowing this beforehand would have changed your natural behavior, we could not disclose it until now. Your data remains completely anonymous and will be used strictly for academic research.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 20px; font-size: 0.9rem; line-height: 1.5; color: var(--text-secondary);">If you consent to submit your data now that you know the true purpose, please click "Submit & Finish" below. If you wish to withdraw, you may simply close this tab.</p>
<button id="btn-submit-final" class="btn-primary" style="width: 100%;">Submit & Finish</button>
Comment on lines +388 to +390
btn.addEventListener('click', (e) => {
STATE.manipulation_noticed = parseInt(e.target.dataset.val);

Comment on lines +391 to +394
// Append this crucial metric to every trial row before sending
STATE.results.forEach(row => {
row.manipulation_noticed = STATE.manipulation_noticed;
});
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@copilot apply changes based on this feedback

Repository owner deleted a comment from chatgpt-codex-connector bot Mar 13, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants