Conversation
|
Thanks for taking time to do that. My only concern is that my patched version of the jar included support for Ruby Symbols. Over a year ago I created a JIRA JAVA-441 ticket to add it to the java driver but nothing was done about it. I will send them a pull request. Unfortunately I am not using jmongo or jruby at the moment. Are you interested in taking over this project? |
|
sure... I'll take it over Jason Rogers On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Guy Boertje notifications@github.comwrote:
|
|
How important is JAVA-441? Certainly we can get along with just strings. Jason Rogers On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Guy Boertje notifications@github.comwrote:
|
|
The ruby driver supports deserializing symbols and so I wanted to try to Have you looked at the Moped driver? Guy On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Jason Rogers notifications@github.comwrote:
|
|
My Java fu is fine, though I don't want to have to support a modified JAR. Hadn't heard of moped. Will look into it. Thanks. Jason Rogers On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Guy Boertje notifications@github.comwrote:
|
|
Have a look at the pull request - its a single line change. Moped is v good. It was not available when jmongo started. On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Jason Rogers notifications@github.comwrote:
|
|
Do you know of any benchmark suites for it? Jason Rogers On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Guy Boertje notifications@github.comwrote:
|
|
no - but I suspect the one that Chuck Remes built to benchmark his first On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Jason Rogers notifications@github.comwrote:
|
|
Thanks. I'll work up a script as well. Jason Rogers On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Guy Boertje notifications@github.comwrote:
|
|
read this if you haven't already, about jmongo benchmarking ... http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/3841457 Chuck and I replied. |
|
Thanks. Jason Rogers On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Guy Boertje notifications@github.comwrote:
|
Please take a look. I didn't spend a lot of time on this. And I only tested it against the specs you already had (which isn't very extensive). Seems to work fine.