Custom docker build via github action#23
Merged
grasdk merged 21 commits intofeature/custom-docker-buildfrom Jan 4, 2026
Merged
Custom docker build via github action#23grasdk merged 21 commits intofeature/custom-docker-buildfrom
grasdk merged 21 commits intofeature/custom-docker-buildfrom
Conversation
New workflow for building test-images manually using github actions.
* Added a build-from-commit_id github actions workflow to be manually triggered (#17) * Feature/build from commit (#18) * Added a build-from-commit_id github actions workflow to be manually triggered * updated the build-yml with bugfix for tar-mode. Added contributing description * Extended dscription * multi arch build for tar * build tar for 1 architecture and support semver * Added versioning note and renamed build-file * update run-name * only build alpine * change fetch depth to build from history dockerfile * change fetch depth to build from history dockerfile (#19) * fixed armv7 option * fix filenaming * removed tar building. only publish to docker-hub. Update version in package.json * overwriting version in the release json instead * update usage guide on the 3.0.0-pre_alpha release workflow * and publish * update to documentation * updated description * update workflow and updated description * fixing
* Added a build-from-commit_id github actions workflow to be manually triggered (#17) * Feature/build from commit (#18) * Added a build-from-commit_id github actions workflow to be manually triggered * updated the build-yml with bugfix for tar-mode. Added contributing description * Extended dscription * multi arch build for tar * build tar for 1 architecture and support semver * Added versioning note and renamed build-file * update run-name * only build alpine * change fetch depth to build from history dockerfile * change fetch depth to build from history dockerfile (#19) * fixed armv7 option * fix filenaming * removed tar building. only publish to docker-hub. Update version in package.json * overwriting version in the release json instead * update usage guide on the 3.0.0-pre_alpha release workflow * and publish * update to documentation * updated description * update workflow and updated description * fixing * ad
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Needed a fast and easy way to generate docker images for my pi3b, without setting up a build environment on the pi itself. Also didn't want the hassle of QEMU, så used github actions instead. To make images, I use the fact that they're created when using the github actions module "docker/build-push-action@v5".
Added various optional input to control the build and tried to make it future proof, by having it detect supported architectures and node versions from the source code and from the availability of both base images and packages.
Incidentally that also causes the workflow to be able to build older versions of pigallery2. I have done a few pin point tests since they are good test material. Had success with several versions.