Skip to content

Conversation

@fahimfaisaal
Copy link
Member

@fahimfaisaal fahimfaisaal commented Jul 3, 2025

and reusability.

Description

Brief description of what this PR does.

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation update
  • Performance improvement
  • Refactoring

Changes Made

Testing

  • Tests pass locally
  • Added new tests for the changes
  • Updated existing tests if needed

Performance Impact

  • No performance impact
  • Performance improvement
  • Potential performance regression (explain below)

Checklist

  • Code follows the project's style guidelines
  • Self-review of code completed
  • Code is commented where necessary
  • Documentation updated if needed
  • No new warnings or errors introduced

Related Issues

Fixes #(issue number)

Additional Notes

Any additional information that reviewers should know.

- Introduced a new action to set up the Go environment with caching.
- Updated CI workflow to utilize the new setup-go action for both testing and benchmarking jobs, improving code organization and reusability.
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 3, 2025

Walkthrough

The GitHub Actions workflow configuration was updated by renaming the "build" job to "test" and simplifying its test execution command. Additionally, a new "bench" job was introduced to run Go benchmark tests, with both jobs leveraging Go module caching. The coverage upload step remains unchanged.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/ci.yml Renamed "build" job to "test", simplified test command, added "bench" job for benchmarks, retained coverage upload step.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant GitHub Actions
    participant Test Job
    participant Bench Job

    GitHub Actions->>Test Job: Run Go tests (single-line command)
    Test Job->>GitHub Actions: Upload coverage

    GitHub Actions->>Bench Job: Run Go benchmarks (single-line command)
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Poem

In the CI meadow, jobs hop anew,
"Build" became "test" with a streamlined view.
Benchmarks now run with a thump and a dash,
Go code is checked with a cache in the stash.
🐇 With each workflow leap, our code grows strong—
Hopping through pipelines, we benchmark along!


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (1)

49-51: Consider persisting benchmark results

You’re running benchmarks but not capturing the output.
If historical performance tracking is valuable, upload the go test output (or a processed JSON) as an artifact or push to a dedicated benchmarking service.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 23138e4 and a650db8.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/actions/setup-go/action.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: CI
.github/actions/setup-go/action.yml

[error] 1-1: Can't find 'action.yml', 'action.yaml' or 'Dockerfile' under the directory. Possibly missing actions/checkout step before running the local action.

Comment on lines 4 to 7
go-version:
description: "Go version to use"
required: false
default: "^1.24"
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Default Go version should be a concrete, released version (or stable)

^1.24 is not a released Go version and may cause the job to resolve to an unexpected nightly build or fail once 1.24 RC is removed. Pin to a known-good major/minor (e.g. 1.22.x) or simply use stable.

-    default: "^1.24"
+    # Use the latest released Go in the 1.22 line.
+    default: "1.22.x"
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
go-version:
description: "Go version to use"
required: false
default: "^1.24"
go-version:
description: "Go version to use"
required: false
# Use the latest released Go in the 1.22 line.
default: "1.22.x"
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .github/actions/setup-go/action.yml at lines 4 to 7, the default Go version
is set to "^1.24", which is not a concrete released version and may cause
resolution issues. Change the default value to a specific released version like
"1.22.x" or use "stable" to ensure the action uses a known-good Go version.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 3, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (2)

31-36: Use the newly-added custom action instead of the upstream one

The PR description states that a custom setup-go action was created to centralise configuration & caching, yet this step still calls the public actions/setup-go@v4.
Switching to the in-repo action (e.g. ./.github/actions/setup-go) will actually exercise the new code and avoid future divergence.

-      - name: Set up Go
-        uses: actions/setup-go@v4
+      - name: Set up Go
+        uses: ./.github/actions/setup-go

If the intention is to keep the upstream action, please update the PR description accordingly to avoid confusion.


47-62: Bench job still runs unit tests – add -run=^$ (and disable cache) for accurate benchmarks

go test -bench=. -benchmem also executes all tests, which doubles the run time and can skew benchmark results.
Benchmarks should be executed with tests disabled and caching turned off:

-      - name: Run benchmark tests
-        run: go test -bench=. -benchmem
+      - name: Run benchmark tests
+        run: go test -bench=. -benchmem -run=^$ -count=1

This change keeps the job focused, short, and reliable.

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (2)

37-38: Minor: preserve module reproducibility flags

Consider appending -mod=readonly (and optionally -trimpath) so that the job fails when go.mod / go.sum drift and to produce deterministic paths in coverage files.

-        run: go test -race -coverprofile=coverage.txt -covermode=atomic ./...
+        run: go test -race -mod=readonly -coverprofile=coverage.txt -covermode=atomic ./...

55-58: Optional: tighten cache settings for monorepos

If the repo ever gains multiple go.mod files, specify them explicitly:

with:
  go-version: "^1.24"
  cache: true
  cache-dependency-path: |
    **/go.sum

This prevents cross-module cache pollution.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a650db8 and 01f509a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.7)
.github/workflows/ci.yml

55-55: the runner of "actions/setup-go@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

@fahimfaisaal fahimfaisaal changed the title chore: add custom setup-go action for CI workflows chore: seperate test and bench job to accelerate the ci process Jul 3, 2025
@fahimfaisaal fahimfaisaal merged commit 844f8ef into main Jul 3, 2025
4 checks passed
@fahimfaisaal fahimfaisaal deleted the ci/composite-action branch July 3, 2025 00:51
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 26, 2025
17 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants