Upgrade license to OFL

[davelab6]

All references to Apache need to be replaced with OFL in source and the next builds

[luke-jr]

Please don't. OFL is non-free (it forbids sale).

If you must, please leave Apache as an option.

[davelab6]

Please don't. OFL is non-free (it forbids sale).

It forbids sale "by itself", which Debian, OSI and FSF all accepted as free.

If you must, please leave Apache as an option.

This won't happen.

[luke-jr]

It forbids sale "by itself", which Debian, OSI and FSF all accepted as free.

Yet it remains by definition non-free.

This won't happen.

Why not?

[davelab6]

It forbids sale "by itself", which Debian, OSI and FSF all accepted as free.

Yet it remains by definition non-free.

Kindly, I don't accept your personal opinion as a definition; I accept https://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses#DFSG-compatible_Licenses & https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#Fonts & https://opensource.org/license/ofl-1-1 all being in agreement as a "widely shared" definition.

This won't happen.

Why not?

Because it is helpful for end-users to find all fonts in a type library under the same license, which is an ideal yet to be practically achieved for the google fonts library, but that license for this library is the OFL.