Skip to content

chore(ci): Disable codeowners-coverage workflow#112390

Merged
bc-sentry merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
bc-sentry/disable-codeowners-coverage
Apr 7, 2026
Merged

chore(ci): Disable codeowners-coverage workflow#112390
bc-sentry merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
bc-sentry/disable-codeowners-coverage

Conversation

@bc-sentry
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bc-sentry bc-sentry commented Apr 7, 2026

Disabling the codeowners-coverage for now as it is an optional check and people are getting flagged to fix things unrelated to their PR. We should only be flagging people that touch unowned things as the implication is they’re in a position to understand those things. We will re-enable after improving this check.

Disables the codeowners-coverage GitHub Actions workflow by commenting out the pull_request trigger and switching to workflow_dispatch only. This prevents the workflow from running automatically on PRs while still allowing manual triggering if needed.

@bc-sentry bc-sentry requested a review from a team as a code owner April 7, 2026 18:15
@bc-sentry bc-sentry merged commit e2cebde into master Apr 7, 2026
53 checks passed
@bc-sentry bc-sentry deleted the bc-sentry/disable-codeowners-coverage branch April 7, 2026 18:46
george-sentry pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2026
Disabling the `codeowners-coverage` for now as it is an optional check
and people are getting flagged to fix things unrelated to their PR. We
should only be flagging people that touch unowned things as the
implication is they’re in a position to understand those things. We will
re-enable after improving this check.

Disables the `codeowners-coverage` GitHub Actions workflow by commenting
out the `pull_request` trigger and switching to `workflow_dispatch`
only. This prevents the workflow from running automatically on PRs while
still allowing manual triggering if needed.

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants