feat: add speciesist language rules as community example#284
feat: add speciesist language rules as community example#284stuckvgn wants to merge 1 commit intoget-woke:mainfrom
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👋 Thanks for submitting your first PR!
Please be sure to read and follow our Code of Conduct and Contributing guide.
⭐️ Is your org or open source project using woke? If so, we'd love for you to be included in the 'Who uses woke' list at https://github.com/get-woke/woke/blob/main/docs/about.md#who-uses-woke.
|
Relevant precedent since this PR was opened: webpack just merged equivalent speciesism rules into their docs CI — webpack/webpack.js.org#7880. Same idioms, same framing, Vale-based. Noting here as a signal that this category is landing elsewhere in the ecosystem. |
|
Friendly ping @caitlinelfring — this adds speciesist language rules as a community example. For context, webpack merged equivalent rules last week. Would appreciate a look when convenient. |
|
Closing this PR — on reflection, this change may not be the right fit for this project. Thanks for your time! |
Summary
speciesismcategory for easy filteringContext
Every major inclusive language scanner covers racial, gender, and ableist language — none currently include speciesism. Recent peer-reviewed research has established that AI systems and language tools encode speciesist bias:
This contribution follows woke's philosophy of letting users decide what's inclusive — the rules are provided as an opt-in example configuration, not as default rules. Users can adopt them via:
All rules use the
speciesismcategory, so users who include them alongside other rules can easily exclude them with:Examples
Test plan
wokeCLI