Added more keywords/rules based on the inclusivenaming.org#250
Added more keywords/rules based on the inclusivenaming.org#250DariuszPorowski wants to merge 1 commit intoget-woke:mainfrom
Conversation
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👋 Thanks for submitting your first PR!
Please be sure to read and follow our Code of Conduct and Contributing guide.
⭐️ Is your org or open source project using woke? If so, we'd love for you to be included in the 'Who uses woke' list at https://github.com/get-woke/woke/blob/main/docs/about.md#who-uses-woke.
|
Hi @caitlinelfring I'd just like to follow up about this PR. |
|
According to https://github.com/get-woke/woke/blob/main/docs/rules.md woke supports categories. inclusivenaming.org also has tier 1 - tier 3 categories. It seems it would be useful to specify the categories here as well to benefit from being able indluce/exclude categories. |
|
@tyll makes sense. happy to do that, but it looks like woke is abandoned project, @caitlinelfring? |
2 participants
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (What changes might users need to make due to this PR?)
N/A
Other information:
N/A