Skip to content

Conversation

@zedlopez
Copy link
Contributor

A replacement for PR #174 in regard to I7-2356. I just noted in a comment there that the docs are specific that an action succeeds once its Carry Out rules have been reached, so this behavior seems preferable.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant