Open
Conversation
Contributor
|
Groovvy baby! Yes, I think we have to put these tools into "Ecology" + "Convert formats" main TS categoies. "Data source" is not relevant I think.... |
Contributor
Author
|
Yes this option can be problematic for workflow. |
yvanlebras
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 18, 2020
fix flake8 and flake8-import-order problems
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Two new and small tools, useful to manipulate rdata files very common in the ecological community
1- Load and give insight on a rdata file.
2- Extract the wanted attributes
I'm almost certain that the Ecology TS category is not optimal.
Maybe a more data oriented category would be better : "converts format" or "Data source" ?