Skip to content

Do not assume project layout#1616

Open
twiggler wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
no-assume-project-layout
Open

Do not assume project layout#1616
twiggler wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
no-assume-project-layout

Conversation

@twiggler
Copy link
Contributor

Make tests independent of project layout

@twiggler twiggler force-pushed the no-assume-project-layout branch from 4b0461b to 2d2f1bd Compare March 12, 2026 10:25
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 12, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 81.12%. Comparing base (b07019c) to head (2d2f1bd).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1616   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.12%   81.12%           
=======================================
  Files         401      401           
  Lines       35091    35091           
=======================================
  Hits        28467    28467           
  Misses       6624     6624           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 81.12% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Member

@Schamper Schamper left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Capitalize the PR title please.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Mar 12, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 12 untouched benchmarks


Comparing no-assume-project-layout (4b0461b) with main (b07019c)

Open in CodSpeed

@twiggler twiggler changed the title do not assume project layout Do not assume project layout Mar 12, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants