Add NTDS Group Policy records

[Matthijsy]

This PR adds a method that exports all Group Policies which can be fetched from the NTDS.

We might have to consider how this relates to adpolicy plugin. They are kinda related, but depend on completly different artifacts.

Depends on fox-it/dissect.database#38
Depends on: fox-it/dissect.database#41

[Schamper]

Could you use either the "typed"/"defined" properties for these attributes on the objects' class, or the .get method for the attributes that don't yet have a property defined on their Python classes?

[Matthijsy]

So you mean defining them as property in dissect.database or using .get. Currently there are no properties defined, but we could add them. I can do both, what would be the prefered method, as I see computer/user is using a mix of those two options.

[Schamper]

Some of these exist in the base Object class already:

https://github.com/fox-it/dissect.database/blob/357f64263d1733330bb250fb50bdd019ad438e52/dissect/database/ese/ntds/objects/object.py#L198

The intention is to have most of the attributes added as Python properties over time in their classes, but for some it's fine to just use .get() for now. If you're willing to add the proper attributes to the proper classes, that's of course appreciated!

My point is more, while "magic attributes" exist on these objects (e.g. doing .whenCreated works), I'd prefer to use properly typed/available properties and methods in library code, such as .when_created or .get("whenCreated"). The magic attributes are more nice for interactive use.

[Matthijsy]

Okay that makes sense. I created a PR to add 2 more fields within dissect.database, than all needed attributes of GPO are actually there.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 81.00%. Comparing base (7dfd85f) to head (3d9e7bf).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1559   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.99%   81.00%           
=======================================
  Files         399      399           
  Lines       34848    34853    +5     
=======================================
+ Hits        28226    28231    +5     
  Misses       6622     6622           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	81.00% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 12 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1 skipped benchmark¹

---

_{Comparing Matthijsy:ntds-group-policies (3d9e7bf) with main (7dfd85f)}

Footnotes

1. 1 benchmark was skipped, so the baseline result was used instead. If it was deleted from the codebase, click here and archive it to remove it from the performance reports. ↩