Skip to content

pull for forked repositories#1351

Closed
Dmitriy-Litvinenko wants to merge 10 commits intomasterfrom
UIREQ-1313-1314
Closed

pull for forked repositories#1351
Dmitriy-Litvinenko wants to merge 10 commits intomasterfrom
UIREQ-1313-1314

Conversation

@Dmitriy-Litvinenko
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 20, 2026

Jest Unit Test Results

    1 files  ± 0     66 suites  ±0   1m 49s ⏱️ +9s
  882 tests +33    882 ✅ +33  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
1 244 runs  +33  1 244 ✅ +33  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit a61d9c0. ± Comparison against base commit 4150802.

This pull request removes 6 and adds 39 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.
RequestsRoute getListFormatter requester should trigger NoValue component ‑ RequestsRoute getListFormatter requester should trigger NoValue component
UserDetail when all data provided should trigger "getFullName" with correct argument ‑ UserDetail when all data provided should trigger "getFullName" with correct argument
UserDetail when proxy barcode is not provided should render "NoValue" component once ‑ UserDetail when proxy barcode is not provided should render "NoValue" component once
UserDetail when proxy id and proxy user id are not provided should not render proxy label ‑ UserDetail when proxy id and proxy user id are not provided should not render proxy label
UserForm When user id is not provided should trigger "userHighlightBox" with requester id ‑ UserForm When user id is not provided should trigger "userHighlightBox" with requester id
UserForm When user id is provided should trigger "userHighlightBox" with user id ‑ UserForm When user id is provided should trigger "userHighlightBox" with user id
RequestsRoute getListFormatter requester should render Anonymized ‑ RequestsRoute getListFormatter requester should render Anonymized
UserForm When user id is not provided should trigger "computeUserDisplayForRequest" with requester id ‑ UserForm When user id is not provided should trigger "computeUserDisplayForRequest" with requester id
UserForm When user id is provided should trigger "computeUserDisplayForRequest" with user id ‑ UserForm When user id is provided should trigger "computeUserDisplayForRequest" with user id
computeUserDisplayForRequest has expected user display values for anonymized requester + null proxy for proxyBarcode ‑ computeUserDisplayForRequest has expected user display values for anonymized requester + null proxy for proxyBarcode
computeUserDisplayForRequest has expected user display values for anonymized requester + null proxy for proxyName ‑ computeUserDisplayForRequest has expected user display values for anonymized requester + null proxy for proxyName
computeUserDisplayForRequest has expected user display values for anonymized requester + null proxy for requesterBarcode ‑ computeUserDisplayForRequest has expected user display values for anonymized requester + null proxy for requesterBarcode
computeUserDisplayForRequest has expected user display values for anonymized requester + null proxy for requesterName ‑ computeUserDisplayForRequest has expected user display values for anonymized requester + null proxy for requesterName
computeUserDisplayForRequest has expected user display values for null requester + proxy for proxyBarcode ‑ computeUserDisplayForRequest has expected user display values for null requester + proxy for proxyBarcode
computeUserDisplayForRequest has expected user display values for null requester + proxy for proxyName ‑ computeUserDisplayForRequest has expected user display values for null requester + proxy for proxyName
computeUserDisplayForRequest has expected user display values for null requester + proxy for requesterBarcode ‑ computeUserDisplayForRequest has expected user display values for null requester + proxy for requesterBarcode
…

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@Dmitriy-Litvinenko Dmitriy-Litvinenko marked this pull request as draft January 21, 2026 10:43
@Dmitriy-Litvinenko Dmitriy-Litvinenko marked this pull request as ready for review January 21, 2026 10:44
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 5, 2026

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
6.6% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@Dmitriy-Litvinenko Dmitriy-Litvinenko deleted the UIREQ-1313-1314 branch February 19, 2026 12:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants