-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
ci(labels): add label sync workflow + labels catalog #59
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@flyingrobots has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 1 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughIntroduces automated GitHub label management via a new Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes
Suggested labels
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/labels.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/label-sync.yml(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
- GitHub Check: Schema validation (v1)
- GitHub Check: Link Check (xtask links)
- GitHub Check: audit
- GitHub Check: fmt
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/labels.yml (1)
1-66: YAML syntax is now properly corrected—past issue resolved.All label names containing colons (e.g.,
type: bug,priority: p1,needs: repro) are correctly wrapped in double quotes. The file will parse withoutPsych::SyntaxError..github/workflows/label-sync.yml (2)
1-22: Workflow structure and integration with labels catalog is sound.The trigger is appropriately scoped to
.github/labels.ymlchanges (avoiding spurious runs),workflow_dispatchenables manual override, andskip_delete: truehonors the non-destructive sync requirement from the PR objectives. Theyaml_filereference is correct and aligned with the labels catalog.
9-11: The permissions are correct—no changes needed.The original concern was unfounded. crazy-max/ghaction-github-labeler requires repository read on contents and write on issues for label synchronization, which is exactly what the workflow declares. The action's own documented example uses this exact permission set. No escalation to
contents: writeis required.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
…mittent npx exit 126 on CI; keep npx as fallback
…cal mermaid-cli and rerun with mmdc
… (avoid duplicates with xtask/privacy and schemas/p0)
Summary
Follow-ups after merge