Skip to content

Conversation

@mesr
Copy link
Contributor

@mesr mesr commented Aug 10, 2023

This turned out to be a bit more involving than I first thought. It was easy to come up with a working proof of concept, but the challenge was in balancing simplicity with functionality while staying true to the original code.

For keeping things simple, I left out of this draft PR the TS types and most tests. However, before I spend more time packaging a more complete version, I would appreciate your feedback on the direction it's taking. Thanks in advance!

This PR implements proposal #59.

@mesr mesr marked this pull request as ready for review August 10, 2023 16:40
@mesr mesr force-pushed the concurrency-handling branch 5 times, most recently from f4d616e to 215680a Compare August 10, 2023 18:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant