DEV -> PROD #25
DEV -> PROD #25
Conversation
* refactor: 로그인, 홈, 일정, 공지사항, FAQ, 분실물 페이지 modal 모바일 환경 사이즈 리팩터링 * refactor: 모바일 환경일때만 여백 추가
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@changuii has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 24 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthrough이 PR은 모바일 레이아웃 지원을 강화하기 위해 여러 모달 및 페이지 컴포넌트에 Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Pre-merge checks❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
src/components/modals/PlaceImagesModal.jsx (1)
346-349: Review padding implementation for double padding on mobile.The Modal component with
enableMobileLayout={true}applies padding (px-4 py-4on mobile,p-6on desktop). The inner div at line 349 also applies padding (p-4on mobile,p-6on desktop), resulting in double padding. This is inconsistent with LostItemModal.jsx and LostItemGuideModal.jsx (which rely solely on Modal padding).However, since the inner div is a scrollable container (
max-h-[70vh] overflow-y-auto), the padding may be intentional to keep it inside the scroll area. If this is the intended behavior, document it. Otherwise, remove the inner padding and rely on Modal padding only:- <div className={`${isMobile ? 'p-4 max-h-[70vh] overflow-y-auto' : 'p-6 h-[800px]'} flex flex-col`}> + <div className={`${isMobile ? 'max-h-[70vh] overflow-y-auto' : 'h-[800px]'} flex flex-col`}>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
src/components/layout/Sidebar.jsxsrc/components/modals/AnnouncementModal.jsxsrc/components/modals/EventDateModal.jsxsrc/components/modals/EventModal.jsxsrc/components/modals/FaqModal.jsxsrc/components/modals/FestivalImagesModal.jsxsrc/components/modals/FestivalInfoModal.jsxsrc/components/modals/LineupAddModal.jsxsrc/components/modals/LineupEditModal.jsxsrc/components/modals/LostItemGuideModal.jsxsrc/components/modals/LostItemModal.jsxsrc/components/modals/PasswordChangeModal.jsxsrc/components/modals/PlaceImagesModal.jsxsrc/components/modals/PushNotificationConfirmModal.jsxsrc/pages/CouncilLoginPage.jsxsrc/pages/FestivalPage.jsx
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (14)
src/components/modals/AnnouncementModal.jsx (1)
src/components/common/Modal.jsx (1)
Modal(4-95)
src/components/modals/LineupAddModal.jsx (1)
src/components/common/Modal.jsx (1)
Modal(4-95)
src/pages/FestivalPage.jsx (4)
src/pages/EventPage.jsx (1)
useModal(8-8)src/pages/CouncilLoginPage.jsx (1)
isMobile(10-10)src/App.jsx (2)
isMobile(54-54)openModal(65-65)src/components/layout/UseIsMobile.jsx (1)
useIsMobile(3-16)
src/components/modals/PasswordChangeModal.jsx (1)
src/components/common/Modal.jsx (1)
Modal(4-95)
src/components/modals/LostItemGuideModal.jsx (1)
src/components/common/Modal.jsx (1)
Modal(4-95)
src/components/modals/FestivalImagesModal.jsx (2)
src/components/common/Modal.jsx (2)
isMobile(18-18)Modal(4-95)src/components/layout/UseIsMobile.jsx (1)
useIsMobile(3-16)
src/components/modals/LostItemModal.jsx (1)
src/components/common/Modal.jsx (1)
Modal(4-95)
src/components/modals/FaqModal.jsx (1)
src/components/common/Modal.jsx (1)
Modal(4-95)
src/components/modals/EventModal.jsx (1)
src/components/common/Modal.jsx (1)
Modal(4-95)
src/components/modals/FestivalInfoModal.jsx (1)
src/components/common/Modal.jsx (1)
Modal(4-95)
src/components/modals/LineupEditModal.jsx (4)
src/components/common/Modal.jsx (1)
Modal(4-95)src/components/modals/LineupAddModal.jsx (1)
handleClose(236-240)src/components/modals/LostItemModal.jsx (1)
handleClose(143-147)src/components/modals/AddImageModal.jsx (1)
handleClose(153-157)
src/components/modals/PushNotificationConfirmModal.jsx (1)
src/components/common/Modal.jsx (1)
Modal(4-95)
src/pages/CouncilLoginPage.jsx (1)
src/components/layout/UseIsMobile.jsx (1)
useIsMobile(3-16)
src/components/modals/EventDateModal.jsx (1)
src/components/common/Modal.jsx (1)
Modal(4-95)
🔇 Additional comments (17)
src/components/layout/Sidebar.jsx (1)
127-127: Branding capitalization change looks good.The update from "Festabook" to "festabook" aligns with the PR objective to remove the capital "F" from the sidebar. This is a minor, intentional UI refinement for consistency.
src/components/modals/LineupAddModal.jsx (1)
243-243: LGTM – Mobile layout enabled for lineup modal.The addition of
enableMobileLayout={true}is consistent with the PR's objective to provide mobile-responsive modals across the application.src/components/modals/EventDateModal.jsx (1)
47-47: LGTM – Mobile layout support added.Enabling mobile layout for the event date modal improves the user experience on smaller screens.
src/components/modals/EventModal.jsx (1)
173-173: LGTM – Mobile layout improves form usability.The mobile layout will be particularly helpful for this modal given its form-heavy content with date and time selectors.
src/components/modals/FaqModal.jsx (1)
53-53: LGTM – Mobile layout enabled.The mobile-optimized layout will improve the editing experience for FAQ content on smaller devices.
src/components/modals/PushNotificationConfirmModal.jsx (1)
23-23: LGTM – Mobile layout for notification preview.Mobile layout support ensures the notification preview and warning sections display properly on smaller screens.
src/components/modals/AnnouncementModal.jsx (2)
82-82: LGTM – Mobile layout enabled for announcement editor.The mobile layout will improve the editing experience for announcements on smaller devices.
187-187: LGTM – Mobile layout enabled for announcement detail view.Consistent mobile layout support across both announcement modals ensures a uniform user experience.
src/components/modals/FestivalInfoModal.jsx (1)
76-76: LGTM – Mobile layout for festival info editing.The mobile layout will particularly benefit the date selector interfaces on smaller screens.
src/components/modals/PasswordChangeModal.jsx (1)
113-113: LGTM – Mobile layout enabled for password change.This completes the systematic rollout of mobile layout support across all modal components. The consistent implementation ensures a uniform mobile experience throughout the application.
src/components/modals/PlaceImagesModal.jsx (1)
414-414: LGTM: Mobile spacing adjustment.The conditional top margin on mobile improves visual spacing for the notice section.
src/components/modals/LostItemModal.jsx (1)
150-151: LGTM: Correct mobile layout implementation.Enabling
enableMobileLayout={true}and removing the inner padding class is the correct approach. The Modal component handles padding internally, avoiding double padding.src/components/modals/LostItemGuideModal.jsx (1)
12-13: LGTM: Consistent mobile layout implementation.Following the same pattern as LostItemModal.jsx, this correctly enables mobile layout support and removes inner padding to avoid double padding.
src/components/modals/LineupEditModal.jsx (1)
297-297: LGTM: Mobile layout support enabled.Adding
enableMobileLayout={true}enables responsive modal sizing and padding on mobile devices.src/pages/FestivalPage.jsx (1)
4-4: LGTM: Clean responsive layout implementation.The mobile detection hook is properly integrated, and the conditional layout classes appropriately switch between desktop (horizontal flex) and mobile (vertical flex) layouts. The password button positioning adjustment on mobile enhances the mobile UX.
Also applies to: 8-8, 142-142, 150-150
src/pages/CouncilLoginPage.jsx (1)
3-3: LGTM: Effective mobile-responsive login page.The mobile detection hook is properly integrated with appropriate responsive adjustments:
- Background logo positioning adapts to screen size
- Form container uses mobile-optimized dimensions and spacing
- Layout remains clean and functional on both mobile and desktop
Also applies to: 10-10, 42-42, 48-48
src/components/modals/FestivalImagesModal.jsx (1)
376-385: LGTM: Mobile-optimized button layout.The conditional button layout properly adapts to mobile with full-width stacked buttons, improving touch targets and usability on smaller screens.
| <Modal | ||
| isOpen={isOpen} | ||
| onClose={onClose} | ||
| maxWidth={isMobile ? 'w-[92vw] max-w-[420px]' : 'max-w-7xl'} | ||
| enableMobileLayout={true} | ||
| > | ||
| <div className={`${isMobile ? 'p-4 max-h-[70vh] overflow-y-auto' : 'p-6 h-[800px]'} flex flex-col`}> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
find . -name "FestivalImagesModal.jsx" -type fRepository: festabook/frontend
Length of output: 109
🏁 Script executed:
cat -n ./src/components/modals/FestivalImagesModal.jsx | sed -n '190,215p'Repository: festabook/frontend
Length of output: 1456
🏁 Script executed:
find . -name "Modal.jsx" -o -name "Modal.js" -o -name "Modal.tsx" -o -name "Modal.ts" | head -20Repository: festabook/frontend
Length of output: 95
🏁 Script executed:
cat -n ./src/components/common/Modal.jsxRepository: festabook/frontend
Length of output: 4018
🏁 Script executed:
find . -name "PlaceImagesModal.jsx" -o -name "LostItemModal.jsx" -o -name "LostItemGuideModal.jsx"Repository: festabook/frontend
Length of output: 195
🏁 Script executed:
cat -n ./src/components/modals/PlaceImagesModal.jsx | head -100Repository: festabook/frontend
Length of output: 4561
🏁 Script executed:
cat -n ./src/components/modals/PlaceImagesModal.jsx | grep -A 15 "return ("Repository: festabook/frontend
Length of output: 2883
🏁 Script executed:
cat -n ./src/components/modals/LostItemModal.jsx | grep -A 15 "return ("Repository: festabook/frontend
Length of output: 1555
🏁 Script executed:
cat -n ./src/components/modals/LostItemGuideModal.jsx | grep -A 15 "return ("Repository: festabook/frontend
Length of output: 1051
Remove double padding in FestivalImagesModal inner div.
The Modal component with enableMobileLayout={true} applies padding (px-4 py-4 on mobile, p-6 on desktop). The inner div at line 204 duplicates this padding (p-4 on mobile, p-6 on desktop), resulting in double padding. For consistency with LostItemModal.jsx and LostItemGuideModal.jsx (which apply padding only at the Modal level), remove the padding from the inner div:
<Modal
isOpen={isOpen}
onClose={onClose}
maxWidth={isMobile ? 'w-[92vw] max-w-[420px]' : 'max-w-7xl'}
enableMobileLayout={true}
>
- <div className={`${isMobile ? 'p-4 max-h-[70vh] overflow-y-auto' : 'p-6 h-[800px]'} flex flex-col`}>
+ <div className={`${isMobile ? 'max-h-[70vh] overflow-y-auto' : 'h-[800px]'} flex flex-col`}>Additionally, the maxWidth prop at line 201 is redundant on mobile—when enableMobileLayout={true} and isMobile={true}, Modal uses its hardcoded mobile size classes and ignores maxWidth.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <Modal | |
| isOpen={isOpen} | |
| onClose={onClose} | |
| maxWidth={isMobile ? 'w-[92vw] max-w-[420px]' : 'max-w-7xl'} | |
| enableMobileLayout={true} | |
| > | |
| <div className={`${isMobile ? 'p-4 max-h-[70vh] overflow-y-auto' : 'p-6 h-[800px]'} flex flex-col`}> | |
| <Modal | |
| isOpen={isOpen} | |
| onClose={onClose} | |
| maxWidth={isMobile ? 'w-[92vw] max-w-[420px]' : 'max-w-7xl'} | |
| enableMobileLayout={true} | |
| > | |
| <div className={`${isMobile ? 'max-h-[70vh] overflow-y-auto' : 'h-[800px]'} flex flex-col`}> |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/components/modals/FestivalImagesModal.jsx around lines 198 to 204, the
Modal is receiving a maxWidth prop and the inner div duplicates padding; remove
the maxWidth prop from the Modal (since enableMobileLayout={true} makes mobile
sizing redundant) and strip the padding classes from the inner div so it no
longer includes 'p-4' or 'p-6' (leave only the sizing/overflow and flex classes)
to avoid double padding and match the other modals.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/dev-cicd.yml.github/workflows/prod-cicd.yml
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/dev-cicd.yml (2)
8-10: LGTM! OIDC permissions correctly added.The
id-token: writepermission is necessary for GitHub Actions to request OIDC tokens for AWS authentication. This is the correct configuration for role-based authentication.
41-42: Excellent security improvement! Verify IAM role configuration.Switching from long-lived access keys to OIDC-based role assumption significantly improves security posture by eliminating stored credentials and using temporary, scoped tokens. The workflow correctly includes the
id-token: writepermission required for GitHub OIDC authentication.Please verify that the IAM role referenced in
AWS_ROLE_TO_ASSUMEis configured with:
- A trust policy allowing GitHub's OIDC provider with the condition for this repository and dev branch
- Sufficient permissions for S3 sync operations and CloudFront invalidation
The expected trust policy condition should be:
{ "Effect": "Allow", "Principal": { "Federated": "arn:aws:iam::ACCOUNT_ID:oidc-provider/token.actions.githubusercontent.com" }, "Action": "sts:AssumeRoleWithWebIdentity", "Condition": { "StringEquals": { "token.actions.githubusercontent.com:sub": "repo:festabook/frontend:ref:refs/heads/dev" } } }
| permissions: | ||
| id-token: write |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add contents: read permission to avoid checkout failure.
When you specify an explicit permissions block in GitHub Actions, all unspecified permissions default to none. The workflow uses actions/checkout@v4 at line 22, which requires contents: read permission. Without it, the checkout step will fail.
🔎 Proposed fix
permissions:
id-token: write
+ contents: read🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .github/workflows/prod-cicd.yml around lines 8 to 9, the explicit permissions
block only grants id-token: write so actions/checkout@v4 (used later) will fail
because unspecified permissions default to none; add contents: read to the
permissions block (e.g., include "contents: read" alongside "id-token: write")
so the checkout action has the required read access.
| role-session-name: frontend-prod-council-deploy | ||
| role-to-assume: ${{ secrets.AWS_ROLE_TO_ASSUME }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
cat -n .github/workflows/prod-cicd.ymlRepository: festabook/frontend
Length of output: 1650
Excellent security improvement with OIDC authentication.
The workflow correctly implements OIDC on the GitHub Actions side with the permissions.id-token: write block and aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials using role assumption. This eliminates long-lived credentials and aligns with security best practices.
Before merging, verify the AWS infrastructure is configured:
- GitHub is registered as an OIDC identity provider in your AWS account
- The IAM role referenced in
AWS_ROLE_TO_ASSUMEhas a trust policy allowing GitHub Actions from this repository - The role has permissions for S3 sync and CloudFront invalidation
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .github/workflows/prod-cicd.yml around lines 37-38, the workflow uses
role-to-assume: ${{ secrets.AWS_ROLE_TO_ASSUME }} with OIDC but the PR needs you
to verify and (if missing) configure the AWS side: register GitHub as an OIDC
identity provider in the AWS account, ensure the IAM role referenced by
AWS_ROLE_TO_ASSUME exists and its trust policy allows GitHub Actions from this
repository (repo-specific subject condition), confirm the secret
AWS_ROLE_TO_ASSUME contains the exact role ARN, and grant that role the
necessary IAM permissions for S3 sync and CloudFront invalidation so the
workflow can assume it successfully.
* feat: coderabbit 지침 추가 * refactor: 코드 래빗이 모든 브랜치를 리뷰하도록 변경
* refactor: 코드래빗 지침 파일명 수정 * refactor: 브랜치 명 수정
.coderabbit.yam
Outdated
| # ========================= | ||
| # CodeRabbit Configuration (Frontend Repository) | ||
| # ========================= | ||
|
|
||
| language: ko | ||
|
|
||
| reviews: | ||
| auto_review: true | ||
|
|
||
| base_branches: | ||
| - ".*" | ||
|
|
||
| instructions: | | ||
| 이 저장소는 프론트엔드 저장소지만, 백엔드/안드로이드 팀원이 함께 작업할 수 있다. | ||
| 프론트엔드 숙련도가 낮을 수 있음을 전제로 하여, | ||
| 문제가 되는 부분이 있다면 단정적으로 지적하지 말고 | ||
| 왜 문제가 될 수 있는지와 맥락을 함께 설명한다. | ||
|
|
||
| 모든 리뷰 코멘트, 제안, 요약은 반드시 한국어로 작성한다. | ||
|
|
||
| 리뷰 범위 및 수준(큰그림 중심): | ||
| - 변수명, 함수명, 포맷팅, 사소한 코드 스타일은 리뷰하지 않는다. | ||
| - 다음 항목을 우선적으로 검토한다: | ||
| 1) 기존에 이미 존재하는 컴포넌트/훅/유틸이 있는데 새로 만들어 중복이 발생했는지 | ||
| 2) 컴포넌트 책임 분리가 부적절하거나 설계가 어색한지 | ||
| (과도한 props drilling, 상태 위치 부적절, 비대해진 컴포넌트 등) | ||
| 3) 화면 흐름, 상태 관리, 데이터 패칭, 에러/로딩 처리의 구조가 일관적인지 | ||
| 4) 성능, 접근성, 모바일 대응에 구조적으로 문제가 될 소지가 있는지 | ||
| 5) 보안, 권한, 민감 정보 노출 가능성이 있는지 | ||
|
|
||
| 장점/단점 및 트레이드오프 분석: | ||
| - 변경된 설계나 구현에 대해 반드시 장점과 단점을 모두 설명한다. | ||
| - 해당 선택이 어떤 트레이드오프를 가지는지 명확히 서술한다. | ||
| - 아래 사항을 질문 형태로 포함할 수 있다: | ||
| - 이 선택이 의도된 트레이드오프인지? | ||
| - 다른 대안과 비교해 현재 방식을 선택한 이유가 있는지? | ||
| - 특별한 이유 없이 선택된 구현이라면 개선 여지가 있는지? | ||
|
|
||
| 이슈 및 PR 의도 반영: | ||
| - PR 설명, 이슈, 커밋 메시지에 드러난 의도를 우선적으로 반영한다. | ||
| - 명시된 의도가 없을 경우, 코드만 보고 추론한 의도를 명확히 밝힌 후 리뷰한다. | ||
| - 구현이 의도를 충분히 충족하는지 여부를 기준으로 평가한다. | ||
|
|
||
| DEV -> PROD PR(릴리즈 PR) 리뷰 규칙: | ||
| - 배포 리스크, 장애 가능성, 사용자 영향이 큰 문제 위주로만 리뷰한다. | ||
| - 사소한 구조 개선이나 리팩터링 제안은 생략한다. | ||
| - 심각한 문제가 없다면 승인 또는 칭찬 위주의 짧은 리뷰로 마무리한다. | ||
|
|
||
| 리뷰 출력 형식(항상 포함): | ||
| 1) [작업 요약] | ||
| - 코드만 보고 이번 PR에서 수행된 작업을 3~7개 불릿으로 정리한다. | ||
| - 단순 나열이 아닌, 기능/구조 단위로 요약한다. | ||
|
|
||
| 2) [의도/목표] | ||
| - PR에서 달성하려는 의도를 정리한다. | ||
| - 명시된 의도 + 코드 기반 추론을 함께 포함한다. | ||
|
|
||
| 3) [설계 평가] | ||
| - 선택된 설계/구현의 장점과 단점을 모두 정리한다. | ||
| - 트레이드오프 관점에서 평가한다. | ||
|
|
||
| 4) [주요 리뷰] | ||
| - 큰그림 기준의 중요한 이슈만 다룬다. | ||
| - 각 항목은 다음 구조를 따른다: | ||
| - 문제 또는 관찰 사항 | ||
| - 영향 범위 | ||
| - 가능한 대안 또는 개선 방향 | ||
|
|
||
| 5) [릴리즈 PR인 경우] | ||
| - 심각한 문제 존재 여부 | ||
| - 문제가 없다면 승인 또는 긍정적 피드백으로 마무리한다. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🚨 CRITICAL: 파일 확장자가 여전히 잘못되어 CodeRabbit이 설정을 인식하지 못합니다
파일명이 .coderabbit.yam으로 되어 있지만, CodeRabbit은 정확히 .coderabbit.yaml (4글자 확장자)을 요구합니다.
현재 상태:
- ✅ 선행 점(.) 추가됨 (이전 리뷰 반영)
- ✅ 접두사 제거됨 (이전
frontend.제거) - ❌ 확장자가
.yam(3글자) →.yaml(4글자)로 수정 필요
영향:
- CodeRabbit이 이 설정 파일을 감지하지 못함
- 프로덕션 환경에서 자동 리뷰, 언어 설정, 리뷰 지침이 모두 무시됨
- 배포 차단 이슈 - 이 PR의 목적(CodeRabbit 설정 활성화)이 달성되지 않음
필수 조치:
파일명을 .coderabbit.yaml로 변경해야 합니다.
🔧 수정 방법
저장소 루트에서 다음 명령어를 실행하여 파일명을 변경하세요:
git mv .coderabbit.yam .coderabbit.yaml
git commit -m "Fix: CodeRabbit 설정 파일 확장자 수정 (.yam -> .yaml)"🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.coderabbit.yam lines 1-71: the configuration file has the wrong extension
(.yam) so CodeRabbit won't detect it; rename the file to .coderabbit.yaml at the
repo root, update any references if present, commit the rename with a clear
message (e.g., "Fix: CodeRabbit config file extension .yam -> .yaml") so
CI/tools pick up the configuration.
* fix: 확장자 명 오타 수정 * fix: auto_review 제거
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.coderabbit.yaml
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.coderabbit.yaml (1)
17-76: 리뷰 지침이 잘 구성되어 있습니다한국어로 작성된 상세한 리뷰 지침이 팀의 요구사항을 잘 반영하고 있습니다:
장점:
- 사소한 스타일 이슈를 제외하고 구조적 문제에 집중하도록 명확히 정의
- 컴포넌트 책임 분리, 중복 코드, 설계 트레이드오프 등 핵심 요소 우선순위화
- 장점/단점 분석과 트레이드오프 평가를 명시적으로 요구
- DEV->PROD PR에 대한 별도 규칙으로 릴리즈 리스크 관리
- 프론트엔드 숙련도가 다양한 팀 구성원을 고려한 설명 중심 접근
출력 형식 요구사항:
작업 요약, 의도/목표, 설계 평가, 주요 리뷰 섹션이 명확히 구조화되어 일관된 리뷰 품질을 보장합니다.
| auto_review: | ||
| enabled: true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
커밋 메시지와 실제 설정의 불일치
커밋 메시지에는 "Fix: removed auto_review"라고 명시되어 있지만, 실제 설정 파일에서는 auto_review.enabled가 true로 설정되어 있습니다.
배포 전에 의도를 명확히 할 필요가 있습니다:
- auto_review를 활성화하려는 것이 맞다면 커밋 메시지가 잘못되었습니다
- auto_review를 비활성화하려는 것이라면 설정을
enabled: false로 변경해야 합니다
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.coderabbit.yaml lines 7-8: the repository commit claims "Fix: removed
auto_review" but the config still sets auto_review.enabled: true; make the
intent consistent by either updating the commit / PR description to state that
auto_review is enabled, or change the configuration to auto_review.enabled:
false if the goal is to remove/disable auto_review; apply the chosen change and
ensure the commit message and file content match before merging.
.coderabbit.yaml
Outdated
| base_branches: | ||
| - ".*" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
설정 구조 오류: base_branches 위치가 잘못되었습니다
스키마에 따르면 base_branches는 auto_review 객체 내부에 중첩되어야 하지만, 현재 reviews 레벨에 직접 배치되어 있습니다. 이로 인해 설정이 무시되거나 검증에 실패할 수 있습니다.
🔎 올바른 YAML 구조로 수정
reviews:
auto_review:
enabled: true
-
- # 모든 base/target 브랜치에서 자동 리뷰 수행 (정규식)
- base_branches:
- - ".*"
+ # 모든 base/target 브랜치에서 자동 리뷰 수행 (정규식)
+ base_branches:
+ - ".*"Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.coderabbit.yaml around lines 11 to 12: base_branches is currently placed at the
top reviews level but must be nested inside the auto_review object per schema;
move the base_branches key under the auto_review mapping (adjust indentation to
match other keys within auto_review) so the YAML schema validation passes and
the setting is applied, then run a YAML linter to confirm no syntax/indentation
errors.
DEV -> PROD
Summary by CodeRabbit
릴리스 노트
새로운 기능
스타일
기타
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.