[Waiting]feat: copy trade #449
Conversation
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| }, | ||
| ]; | ||
|
|
||
| @NgModule({ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code patch looks like a simple addition of a new route for copy-trading. A bug risk to consider would be if there is an error in the implementation of the "AppDerivativesComponent" or "AppCopyTradingModule" modules, which could cause issues with navigation or rendering.
As an improvement suggestion, it might be useful to add guards or authentication checks to restrict access to certain routes based on user roles or permissions. Additionally, documenting the purpose and intention of this new route in comments or documentation may make it clearer to future developers working on this application.
| imports: [RouterModule.forChild(routes)], | ||
| exports: [RouterModule], | ||
| }) | ||
| export class CopyTradingRoutingModule {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This code patch imports three components and sets up the routing for these components.
There are no obvious bug risks in this code patch. However, here are some suggestions for improvement:
- Make sure that the imported components and their dependencies are properly tested.
- Consider adding route guards to restrict access to certain routes based on user authentication.
- Use more descriptive names for components and paths to improve readability and maintainability of the codebase.
- Make sure the routing module is properly documented to aid understanding and maintenance.
Overall, the code patch looks good and accomplishes its intended purpose of setting up routing for the mentioned components.
| declarations: [TradersComponent, TraderComponent, CreateComponent], | ||
| imports: [CommonModule, CopyTradingRoutingModule, TradersModule, TraderModule, CreateModule], | ||
| }) | ||
| export class AppCopyTradingModule {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code appears to be an Angular module declaration. It imports several modules for copy trading functionality, including a routing module, trader and trader creation modules, and the common module. It also declares three components for traders, trader, and trader creation.
Based on this snippet of code, I couldn't find any obvious bugs or issues that could cause runtime errors or crashes. As for improvement suggestions, it would depend on the specific requirements of the application and its architecture. However, from a readability and maintainability standpoint, it might be a good idea to group related import statements together for better organization. Additionally, commenting on the purpose of the module and the components could help developers to understand the intent behind the code.
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
| <view-create></view-create> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This code patch looks very short and only adds a single line of code. It appears to be a custom HTML element named "view-create" that has not been defined in the patch itself.
Without more context or information, it's difficult to assess whether this new element could cause any bugs. However, it would be important to ensure that this new element is properly defined and implemented within the rest of the codebase before merging this patch into the main branch.
As for improvements, it would be helpful to include additional information about the purpose of this element and where it will be used within the application to provide better feedback.
| ngOnInit(): void { | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This code patch seems to be an Angular component that defines a CreateComponent. It imports the necessary Angular libraries, and uses a decorator (@component) to provide metadata about the component.
The CreateComponent does not contain any functionality yet - it simply initializes an empty constructor and ngOnInit method.
As for improvements, since there's no implementation yet, it's hard to say what could be improved. However, some general best practices would include: following consistent naming conventions, organizing imports, and using proper typing and error handling in your code.
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
| <view-trader></view-trader> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This code patch seems to be adding a custom element called "view-trader" to a web page. It is difficult to assess any risks or improvements without seeing the rest of the codebase and understanding the context of how this element is being used.
However, some general suggestions for improvement could be to ensure that the new element conforms to web standards and best practices, such as using appropriate attributes, naming conventions, and accessibility features. Additionally, it may be helpful to test the element on various web browsers and devices to ensure compatibility and functionality.
As for any bugs or risks, it is difficult to identify them without further information about the rest of the code and how it interacts with other elements on the page.
| ngOnInit(): void { | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This code initializes an Angular component named TraderComponent. It imports the Component and OnInit decorators from @angular/core. The selector property specifies how the component is identified in HTML, while the templateUrl and styleUrls properties define the HTML template and style files respectively.
The component has an empty constructor and a lifecycle method ngOnInit that is called when the component is initialized.
Since there is no implementation code in this file, it is not possible to identify any bugs or suggest improvements. However, if there are additional files that interact with this component, a more thorough review may be necessary.
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
| <view-traders></view-traders> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's difficult to provide a comprehensive code review with only one line of code, but based on what is provided:
- It looks like this is a change to add a custom component called "view-traders" to the codebase.
- Without knowing the context and purpose of this component, it's hard to assess whether there are any potential bugs or improvements that could be made.
- However, some general suggestions for code review include making sure that variable and function names are clear and consistent, avoiding unnecessary code duplication, ensuring that code is properly commented and documented, and actively testing and debugging the code.
| ngOnInit(): void { | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a simple Angular component code. Here are some observations:
-
The
importstatements are correct and complete. -
The
@Componentdecorator has the required properties set up correctly:selector,templateUrl, andstyleUrls. -
The
constructormethod is empty, which is fine since there's no initialization logic for this component. -
The
ngOnInit()method is also empty, which is also fine since there's no initialization needed in this component. -
This code snippet is not indicating any bugs or risks at present.
-
As suggestions, you could consider adding more functionalities to the component like data binding, event handling, etc., based on your use case. Also, it's always good practice to keep your code clean and readable by following coding standards and comments when necessary.
| </div> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This code is a HTML and Angular template for a form that allows users to register as exemplary traders. Here are some possible suggestions for improvement:
- Add a
labelelement for the "Register" button for accessibility purposes. - Make sure that the
ngModeldirective is imported and declared in the Angular module where this component is used. - Consider adding server-side validation for the trader name, description, and commission rate after the form is submitted.
- Use CSS classes from a standard framework, such as Bootstrap or Tailwind, to ensure a consistent and responsive design across devices.
- Avoid hard-coding the trading address and add a method to retrieve or generate it dynamically based on the user's account information.
| constructor() {} | ||
|
|
||
| ngOnInit(): void {} | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This code imports the Component and OnInit modules from the "@angular/core" library, declares a CreateComponent class, and sets its selector to 'view-create'.
Inside the class, there is an optional "commissionRate" property that can hold a number value. The constructor is empty, and the ngOnInit method is also empty.
For such a simple class, this code looks fine. However, more context about the purpose of the component could help identify any potential bugs or improvements.
| imports: [CommonModule, FormsModule], | ||
| exports: [CreateComponent], | ||
| }) | ||
| export class CreateModule {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code seems to be creating a module called CreateModule that exports the CreateComponent. The module imports the CommonModule and FormsModule.
A potential improvement suggestion could be to remove the FormsModule if it is not required for the CreateComponent, as this reduces the bundle size of the application. Additionally, if the module is used in a lazy loaded context, it may be beneficial to use RouterModule.forChild() to configure the routing module in the CreateModule.
Overall, there doesn't seem to be any obvious bug risks.
| constructor() {} | ||
|
|
||
| ngOnInit(): void {} | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code looks good and there are no obvious bugs or syntax errors. However, a few suggestions for improvement includes:
-
Add proper comments and documentation to the code so that it can be easily understood and maintained.
-
Use more descriptive variable names to make the code easier to read and understand.
-
Consider creating separate files for CSS and HTML code to make them more organized and easier to maintain.
-
Initialize the
commissionRateandnewRatevariables to a default value to avoid gettingundefinedwhen they are used later in the code. -
If this component is meant to be used as part of a larger application, consider adding input and output properties to enable communication with other components.
Overall, the code looks functional and ready to use, but these suggestions can help improve its readability, maintainability, and extendability.
| imports: [CommonModule, FormsModule], | ||
| exports: [TraderComponent], | ||
| }) | ||
| export class TraderModule {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This code patch appears to be declaring a new Angular module called "TraderModule". The module imports and declares the "TraderComponent", which is defined in a separate file, as well as the CommonModule and FormsModule.
The NgModule decorator is correctly used to configure the import and export of Angular components, directives, and pipes.
Based on this code snippet alone, there are no apparent indications of bugs or risks. However, appropriate error handling should be implemented when accessing data from external sources, such as APIs or databases.
As for improvement suggestions, it would be useful to include comments explaining the purpose of each import statement and the overall purpose of the module. Additionally, it may be helpful to write unit tests for the TraderComponent to ensure that it functions properly.
| ngOnInit(): void { | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This code defines an Angular component called "TradersComponent" with a selector of "view-traders". The component implements the OnInit interface and contains an empty ngOnInit method. It also imports the Component and OnInit classes from the "@angular/core" module, and specifies a templateUrl and styleUrls for the component.
Based on this code alone, it is difficult to identify any potential bug risks, as no logic has been implemented within the component. However, it is generally good practice to thoroughly test components as they are developed, especially if they contain any complex functionality or dependencies.
As for improvement suggestions, it would be helpful to provide more information about the purpose of this component and its role within the larger application. Additionally, consider adding unit tests to ensure the component behaves as expected under different scenarios.
| imports: [CommonModule, RouterModule], | ||
| exports: [TradersComponent], | ||
| }) | ||
| export class TradersModule {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This code appears to be an Angular module for a component called TradersComponent. Some suggestions for improvement:
- It's important to ensure that the imports are up to date and necessary for the component functionality.
- Consider adding any required dependencies to the imports array or providers object in the module decorator.
- Ensure that the naming of components, modules, and files follows best practices and accurately reflects their functionality.
As for bugs, it's hard to determine without seeing the actual component code.
https://github.com/UnUniFi/chain/pull/428
Copy-trading was added as an additional derivatives function.
