Skip to content

Conversation

@Kiefersv
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey All,

Just a tiny update to add the potential temperature to the output file. I am aware that you can calculate it as well, but this is rather convenient for a quick analysis of the GCM.

Let me know if you agree!

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.32%. Comparing base (4b7a9ab) to head (a5276c0).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #62      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   78.30%   78.32%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          14       14              
  Lines        1549     1550       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         1213     1214       +1     
  Misses        336      336              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 78.32% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
gcm_toolkit/exorad/utils.py 91.02% <100.00%> (+0.11%) ⬆️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant