ci: switch to plugin-based code review with sticky comment#89
ci: switch to plugin-based code review with sticky comment#89
Conversation
…y, full permissions
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: fd11d1b9a0
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| on: | ||
| pull_request: | ||
| types: [opened, synchronize, ready_for_review, reopened] | ||
| types: [opened, synchronize] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ready_for_review back to pull_request triggers
Limiting this workflow to opened and synchronize causes draft PRs to miss review entirely when they are later marked ready without a new commit: the configured /code-review plugin is documented to skip draft PRs, so the opened run does nothing, and without a ready_for_review trigger there is no follow-up run. The Claude Code Action docs also call out ready_for_review (and reopened) for tracked PR reviews; dropping it is a functional regression in review coverage.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
…eview workflow Codex review flagged that dropping ready_for_review causes draft PRs to miss review entirely when marked ready without a new commit.
2 participants
Upgrades claude-code-review.yml to use the \ plugin for multi-agent review, plus sticky comment infra and concurrency. Fixes wrong \ param (should be ), adds concurrency, full permissions, and \ flag.