-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Tidied up some minor errors #1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Fixed some typos and possible usability errors.
|
Amazing - thanks for this. Will review and merge ASAP. Ed
|
|
Hi @kitebuggy just a quick question: why remove the .ruby-version and .ruby-gemset files? I find it easier to develop gems with a local gemset and obviously it doesn't affect the gem itself. Thoughts? |
|
Hi Ed, Wow, that was quick! Thanks for taking the time to respond. I'm adding support for Extensions (more or less done for my needs) and Reports (in progress), to allow me to automate the collection of our call records, which is what prompted my work on this. I'm new to gem forking/pulling, so please don't hesitate to let me know if I'm doing anything wrong, or can improve in how I deliver the changes. As for your comment below, I imagine that you're also an RVM user, hence the use of the .ruby-* files. I love this functionality, but when working on the gem, I felt these made unrealistic expectations upon my working environment (e.g. I'm working in Ruby 2.1.2 and my version of 2.0.0 is at a different patch level). By removing these two files from the repo and adding them to the .gitignore file, you and I (and anyone else for that matter) can their own preference files without interfering with each other. You can copy yours back into place and they should be ignored by git during future updates. Does this make sense? I've done something similar with database.yml in RoR deployments, to prevent my local passwords and settings leaking out to the external webserver, for example. I'd welcome your thoughts. Kind regards, Jason On 6 December 2015 at 16:50:02, Ed Jones (notifications@github.com) wrote: Hi @kitebuggy just a quick question: why remove the .ruby-version and .ruby-gemset files? I find it easier to develop gems with a local gemset and obviously it doesn't affect the gem itself. Thoughts? — |
|
Hi Ed, I've added support for extensions and reporting. I've also moved to symbols for the JSON parsing to make it easier to extend and keep in a Ruby-esque tone. I'm a tad new to this pull malarkey, so I hope I've done this right. Would you confirm, please? Thanks, Jason |
|
Ace! Will look ASAP :-)
|
|
Thanks Ed! Sent from my iPhone
|
Fixed some typos and possible usability errors.
(Working on extending functionality in the next pull request)