Hide log_scale button in GUI if negative values in data

[jonathan-eq]

Issue
Resolves #12527

Approach
Short description of the approach

(Screenshot of new behavior in GUI if applicable)

• PR title captures the intent of the changes, and is fitting for release notes.
• Added appropriate release note label
• Commit history is consistent and clean, in line with the contribution guidelines.
• Make sure unit tests pass locally after every commit (git rebase -i main --exec 'just rapid-tests')

When applicable

• When there are user facing changes: Updated documentation
• New behavior or changes to existing untested code: Ensured that unit tests are added (See Ground Rules).
• Large PR: Prepare changes in small commits for more convenient review
• Bug fix: Add regression test for the bug
• Bug fix: Add backport label to latest release (format: 'backport release-branch-name')

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.64%. Comparing base (c528c39) to head (3a94390).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #12672      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.67%   90.64%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         429      429              
  Lines       29803    29816      +13     
==========================================
+ Hits        27025    27028       +3     
- Misses       2778     2788      +10     

Flag	Coverage Δ
cli-tests	37.55% <0.00%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
gui-tests	69.37% <100.00%> (-0.04%)	⬇️
performance-and-unit-tests	73.89% <0.00%> (-0.03%)	⬇️
test	38.06% <0.00%> (-0.02%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging this PR will not alter performance

_{Comparing jonathan-eq:fix-plotter-bug (3a94390) with main (f0d9de4)}

Summary

✅ 22 untouched benchmarks

[xjules]

I think this is relevant only for the genkw parameters. ie. line 277.

[jonathan-eq]

Why would it only be relevant for genkw?