Open
Conversation
corneliusroemer
added a commit
to corneliusroemer/read_docs
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2023
With this configuration, codespell does not show false positives at the moment I used this configuration to fix typos, see PR enasequence#159
nadimm-rahman
approved these changes
Dec 3, 2024
Contributor
nadimm-rahman
left a comment
nadimm-rahman
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggestions look good, thanks for identifying the typos!
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The docs are amazing, just noticed a few typos and thought I'll try to systematically get rid of them by using codespell
This is the result.
If you want to keep the codespell config around for runs in the future, then you can independently merge #160