Skip to content

fix: update logger, fix group member AttributeError, refactor argument validation, and format codebase#21

Merged
Frankoul merged 4 commits intoembyplus:mainfrom
akaBoyLovesToCode:formatter
Feb 13, 2025
Merged

fix: update logger, fix group member AttributeError, refactor argument validation, and format codebase#21
Frankoul merged 4 commits intoembyplus:mainfrom
akaBoyLovesToCode:formatter

Conversation

@akaBoyLovesToCode
Copy link
Contributor

@akaBoyLovesToCode akaBoyLovesToCode commented Feb 12, 2025

This PR includes the following changes:

  1. Logger Configuration Update:

    • Updated the logger to output logs to both the terminal and a log file.
    • Added a StreamHandler to output logs to the terminal for easier debugging in IDEs.
    • Retained a FileHandler to write logs to default.log for persistence.
    • Set logging level based on config.log_level.
  2. Group Member AttributeError Fix:

    • Fixed an AttributeError that occurred when attempting to call get on a User object while accessing the group member's username.
    • Updated the code to properly check if the group member data exists before accessing the username attribute.
  3. Argument Validation Refactor:

    • Refactored the _ensure_args method into the ensure_args decorator for validating argument length.
    • The decorator ensures that the minimum number of arguments is provided before executing the function.
    • This change improves code readability and reusability by using the decorator pattern.
  4. Code Formatting:

    • Applied Ruff to format the entire codebase according to consistent style guidelines.
    • Improved the readability and maintainability of the code by adhering to the selected style.

These changes collectively improve logging functionality, fix error handling, streamline argument validation, and enhance code style consistency.

好的,这是翻译成中文的 pull request 总结:

Sourcery 总结

使用装饰器重构参数验证,修复了访问组成员用户名时导致 AttributeError 的错误,更新了 logger 以输出到终端和文件,并使用 Ruff 格式化了代码库。

新功能:

  • 添加了到终端的日志记录。

Bug 修复:

  • 修复了在访问组成员用户名时尝试对 User 对象调用 get 时发生的 AttributeError。

增强功能:

  • 将参数验证逻辑重构为装饰器。
Original summary in English

Summary by Sourcery

Refactor argument validation using a decorator, fix a bug causing an AttributeError when accessing group member usernames, update the logger to output to both terminal and file, and format the codebase using Ruff.

New Features:

  • Added logging to the terminal.

Bug Fixes:

  • Fixed an AttributeError that occurred when attempting to call get on a User object while accessing the group members username.

Enhancements:

  • Refactored the argument validation logic into a decorator.

- Applied Ruff to format the entire codebase for consistent style
- Improved readability and maintainability by adhering to code style guidelines
- Changed logger to output to both terminal and log file
- Added StreamHandler to output logs to terminal for easier debugging in IDEs
- Retained FileHandler to write logs to default.log for persistence
- Set logging level based on config.log_level
- Converted _ensure_args method to a decorator for validating argument length
- Added ensure_args decorator to check minimum argument length before function execution
- Improved code readability and reusability by using decorator pattern
- Resolved AttributeError caused by attempting to call 'get' on a 'User' object
- Updated code to properly check if group member data exists before accessing 'username'
@sourcery-ai
Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Feb 12, 2025

好的,这是将 pull request review guide 翻译成中文的结果:

🧙 Sourcery 已经完成了对您的 pull request 的审查!


提示和命令

与 Sourcery 互动

  • 触发新的审查: 在 pull request 上评论 @sourcery-ai review
  • 继续讨论: 直接回复 Sourcery 的审查评论。
  • 从审查评论生成 GitHub issue: 回复审查评论,要求 Sourcery 从该评论创建一个 issue。您也可以回复评论并使用 @sourcery-ai issue 来创建一个 issue。
  • 生成 pull request 标题: 在 pull request 标题中任何位置写入 @sourcery-ai 以随时生成标题。您也可以在 pull request 上评论 @sourcery-ai title 以随时(重新)生成标题。
  • 生成 pull request 摘要: 在 pull request 正文中任何位置写入 @sourcery-ai summary 以随时在您想要的位置生成 PR 摘要。您也可以在 pull request 上评论 @sourcery-ai summary 以随时(重新)生成摘要。
  • 生成审查者指南: 在 pull request 上评论 @sourcery-ai guide 以随时(重新)生成审查者指南。
  • 解决所有 Sourcery 评论: 在 pull request 上评论 @sourcery-ai resolve 以解决所有 Sourcery 评论。如果您已经处理了所有评论并且不想再看到它们,这将非常有用。
  • 撤销所有 Sourcery 审查: 在 pull request 上评论 @sourcery-ai dismiss 以撤销所有现有的 Sourcery 审查。如果您想重新开始一个新的审查,这将特别有用 - 别忘了评论 @sourcery-ai review 以触发新的审查!
  • 为一个 issue 生成行动计划: 在一个 issue 上评论 @sourcery-ai plan 以生成一个行动计划。

自定义您的体验

访问您的 dashboard 以:

  • 启用或禁用审查功能,例如 Sourcery 生成的 pull request 摘要、审查者指南等。
  • 更改审查语言。
  • 添加、删除或编辑自定义审查说明。
  • 调整其他审查设置。

获取帮助

Original review guide in English

🧙 Sourcery has finished reviewing your pull request!


Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
  • Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
    an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

嘿 @Qubbby - 我已经查看了你的更改 - 这里有一些反馈:

总体评论

  • ensure_args 装饰器是一个不错的选择,但请考虑是否最好完全在函数外部解析参数。
  • 考虑将类型提示添加到 Config 类属性,以提高可读性和可维护性。
以下是我在审查期间查看的内容
  • 🟢 一般问题:一切看起来都很好
  • 🟢 安全性:一切看起来都很好
  • 🟢 测试:一切看起来都很好
  • 🟢 复杂性:一切看起来都很好
  • 🟢 文档:一切看起来都很好

Sourcery 对开源是免费的 - 如果你喜欢我们的评论,请考虑分享它们 ✨
帮助我变得更有用!请点击每个评论上的 👍 或 👎,我将使用反馈来改进你的评论。
Original comment in English

Hey @Qubbby - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • The ensure_args decorator is a nice touch, but consider if it's better to parse arguments outside the function entirely.
  • Consider adding type hints to the Config class attributes for better readability and maintainability.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@Frankoul Frankoul merged commit 6d4f380 into embyplus:main Feb 13, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
@akaBoyLovesToCode akaBoyLovesToCode deleted the formatter branch February 14, 2025 23:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants