Fix the incorrect initialization of mv_base_idx_vec_ in constuctor of txservice::HashPartitionDataSyncScanCc

[lzxddz]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated internal dependency references with no user-facing changes or impact to functionality.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This PR updates two submodule pointers: store_handler advances from commit a3fdbbc to cd88ee6, and tx_service advances from b823488 to c689ba4. No functional code, APIs, or control flow were modified.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Submodule Updates store_handler, tx_service	Advanced submodule commit references to latest versions; no functional code changes

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• update submodule #177: Updates the tx_service submodule pointer, sharing the same submodule reference advancement.
• update subm #171: Advances both store_handler and tx_service submodule pointers using an identical pattern of recorded commit state progression.

Suggested reviewers

• thweetkomputer

Poem

🐰 Hoppity-hop, submodules aligned,
Two pointers dance in perfect bind,
No broken code, no twists or turns,
Just forward hops as progress burns! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title Check	⚠️ Warning	The PR title claims to "Fix the incorrect initialization of mv_base_idx_vec_ in constructor of txservice::HashPartitionDataSyncScanCc", which suggests a specific code-level change to a class constructor. However, the actual changeset only contains submodule pointer updates for store_handler and tx_service, with both summaries explicitly stating "no functional code" changes. The title describes a specific code fix that is not present in the changeset, making it misleading and unrelated to the actual modifications.	The PR title should be updated to accurately reflect that this changeset only updates submodule references. A more appropriate title would be something like "Update submodule pointers for store_handler and tx_service" or similar, clearly indicating that only submodule state changes are included. If a code fix for the initialization issue is intended, it should either be included in the changeset or the PR should be restructured accordingly.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 657434b and 682465d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• store_handler (1 hunks)
• tx_service (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

tx_service (1)

1-1: Manually verify the submodule commit in the tx_service repository.

The tx_service submodule is not available in this verification environment, so the actual code changes cannot be inspected automatically. Verify that commit c689ba46cd96d232240e2fe8b7b118fd01ddc0f5 in the tx_service repository contains the intended fix for mv_base_idx_vec_ initialization in txservice::HashPartitionDataSyncScanCc and that no unintended changes were introduced.

store_handler (1)

1-1: Verify submodule commit and clarify its relationship to the PR objective.

This change updates the store_handler submodule pointer, but the PR objective mentions fixing initialization in txservice::HashPartitionDataSyncScanCc (which resides in the tx_service submodule, not store_handler).

To validate this change:

• Confirm that commit cd88ee6 is a valid commit in the store_handler submodule repository
• Clarify whether this update is necessary to support the tx_service fix, or if it's an independent fix
• Provide details about what changed in the store_handler submodule (a link to the commit or a summary of changes)

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}