Skip to content

Use JDK 17 instead of 19 in CI#567

Merged
MiguelCompany merged 1 commit into4.0.xfrom
hotfix/4.0.x-ci-jdk-17
Mar 11, 2026
Merged

Use JDK 17 instead of 19 in CI#567
MiguelCompany merged 1 commit into4.0.xfrom
hotfix/4.0.x-ci-jdk-17

Conversation

@MiguelCompany
Copy link
Member

@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany commented Mar 11, 2026

Description

Change the JDK version to the one used in the nightly job.

Contributor Checklist

  • NO: Commit messages follow the project guidelines.
  • N/A: Tests that thoroughly check the new feature have been added/Regression tests checking the bug and its fix have been added; the added tests pass locally
  • N/A: New feature has been documented/Current behavior is correctly described in the documentation.
  • N/A: Applicable backports have been included in the description.

Reviewer Checklist

  • The PR has a milestone assigned.
  • The title and description correctly express the PR's purpose.
  • Check contributor checklist is correct.
  • Check CI results: changes do not issue any warning.
  • Check CI results: failing tests are unrelated with the changes.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Company <miguelcompany@eprosima.com>
@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany added this to the v4.0.6 milestone Mar 11, 2026
@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany requested a review from jepemi March 11, 2026 08:10
@github-actions github-actions bot added the ci-pending PR which CI is running label Mar 11, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@jepemi jepemi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with green CI

@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany merged commit db0890d into 4.0.x Mar 11, 2026
5 checks passed
@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany deleted the hotfix/4.0.x-ci-jdk-17 branch March 11, 2026 09:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ci-pending PR which CI is running

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants