Skip to content

Conversation

@teunbrand
Copy link

Hi there,

Apologies for not posting an issue first.
The ggplot2 package is planning an update for around May 2025 and a reverse dependency test identified a problem with the pafr package.
The details are explained in tidyverse/ggplot2#6290, but essentially ggplot2 doesn't populate the plot$labels field before plot building anymore, which violates some test assumptions in this package.

This PR changes the tests to be compatible with both versions of ggplot2.
You can test the changes yourself with the development version of ggplot2 (pak::pak("tidyverse/ggplot2"))

Best,
Teun

Comment on lines +11 to +13
# expect_equal(unname(labs["x"]), "concat_qstart")
expect_equal(unname(labs["xend"]), "concat_qend")
expect_equal(unname(labs["y"]), "concat_tstart")
# expect_equal(unname(labs["y"]), "concat_tstart")
Copy link
Author

@teunbrand teunbrand Jan 31, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These tests are commented out because the new version reports the labels generated by the scales (instead of just those in the $labels slot) and aren't the same across versions. Visually, the plot is the same though.

@teunbrand teunbrand changed the title Compatibility with ggplot2 3.6.0 Compatibility with ggplot2 4.0.0 Jun 13, 2025
@teunbrand
Copy link
Author

This is a reminder that we aim to release ggplot2 soon, in about 2 weeks. We hope that a fix can be submitted to CRAN around that time. Hopefully this will inform you in a timely manner.

Similar issues are being tracked in tidyverse/ggplot2#6505.

Best wishes,
Teun

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant