Skip to content

Conversation

@mark-summerfield
Copy link
Contributor

In lines 76-77 the term "attributes" is used. But I think the term ought to be "annotations" to match the preceding para? Anyway, as it stands, it doesn't really seem to follow.

Regarding lines 81-82: hasn't contract programming already arrived? If so, shouldn't this para be updated?

In lines 76-77 the term "attributes" is used. But I _think_ the term ought to be "annotations" to match the preceding para? Anyway, as it stands, it doesn't really seem to follow.

Regarding lines 81-82: hasn't contract programming already arrived? If so, shouldn't this para be updated?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant