Conversation
|
Looks like there are a few issues preventing this PR from being merged!
If you'd like me to help, just leave a comment, like Feel free to include any additional details that might help me get this PR into a better state. You can manage your notification settings |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This is a comprehensive code review and documentation update pull request that consolidates authentication middleware, simplifies testing infrastructure, and aligns documentation with the current codebase. The changes focus on improving maintainability while preserving security functionality.
Key Changes
- Consolidated multiple authentication middleware modules into a unified system
- Replaced complex test mocks with simpler in-memory database implementations
- Updated API documentation to reflect current endpoint behaviors
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 86 out of 95 changed files in this pull request and generated 6 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| tests/setupTests.ts | Replaced static mocks with unified in-memory database and shared logger spies |
| src/middleware/auth.ts | Consolidated authentication and authorization into single maintainable module |
| src/docs/index.ts | Simplified documentation system to single static approach |
| tests/integration/*.test.ts | Updated integration tests to use unified mocking approach |
| src/features/*/routes.ts | Updated imports to use consolidated auth middleware |
Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.
| const genId = () => { | ||
| const hex = Math.random().toString(16).slice(2).padEnd(24, '0').slice(0,24); | ||
| return { | ||
| toString: () => hex, | ||
| toHexString: () => hex | ||
| }; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The ID generation function uses Math.random() which could produce duplicate IDs in tests. Consider using a counter-based approach or UUID library for more reliable unique ID generation in test scenarios.
| if ((err as any).name && (err as any).name !== 'UnauthorizedError') { | ||
| return next(err); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The type assertion (err as any) is used multiple times. Consider defining a proper error interface or using type guards for better type safety.
| if (name === 'cloudProviders') { | ||
| (rec as any)._id = _id; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Special case handling for 'cloudProviders' collection suggests inconsistent data modeling. Consider standardizing the _id field handling across all collections.
| if (name === 'cloudProviders') { | |
| (rec as any)._id = _id; | |
| } | |
| // Special case for 'cloudProviders' removed to standardize _id handling | |
| const baseHosts = ['localhost', 'localhost:3001', '127.0.0.1']; | ||
| switch (environment) { | ||
| case 'production': | ||
| return [...baseHosts, 'mwapps.shibari.photo']; | ||
| return [...baseHosts, 'mwapsp.shibari.photo']; | ||
| case 'staging': | ||
| return [...baseHosts, 'mwapss.shibari.photo']; | ||
| case 'development': | ||
| default: | ||
| return [...baseHosts, 'mwapss.shibari.photo', 'mwapps.shibari.photo']; | ||
| return [...baseHosts, 'mwapss.shibari.photo']; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hardcoded allowed hosts in security validation should be configurable through environment variables to prevent accidental exposure of development hosts in production.
| if (env.NODE_ENV === 'test' && typeof code === 'string' && code.includes('timeout')) { | ||
| throw new Error('ECONNABORTED: timeout of 5000ms exceeded'); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Test-specific code in production controller creates maintenance burden. Consider extracting this behavior to a separate test utility or using dependency injection for better separation of concerns.
| // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-var-requires | ||
| const { getDB } = require('../../src/config/db.js'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using require() in an ES module context with eslint-disable comment suggests inconsistent module system usage. Consider using dynamic import() or restructuring to avoid this pattern.
| // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-var-requires | |
| const { getDB } = require('../../src/config/db.js'); | |
| const { getDB } = await import('../../src/config/db.js'); |
1 participant
Pull Request
Description
Brief description of the changes in this PR.
Type of Change
Related Issues
Closes #(issue number)
Changes Made
Documentation Impact
Testing
npm run docs:validateto check documentation linksSecurity Considerations
Architecture Compliance
Checklist
Screenshots (if applicable)
Add screenshots to help explain your changes.
Additional Notes
Any additional information that reviewers should know.