refactor: Move registry functionality out of the attestation crate#8779
refactor: Move registry functionality out of the attestation crate#8779frankdavid wants to merge 6 commits intomasterfrom
Conversation
…egistry_client_helpers
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This pull request changes code owned by the Governance team. Therefore, make sure that
you have considered the following (for Governance-owned code):
-
Update
unreleased_changelog.md(if there are behavior changes, even if they are
non-breaking). -
Are there BREAKING changes?
-
Is a data migration needed?
-
Security review?
How to Satisfy This Automatic Review
-
Go to the bottom of the pull request page.
-
Look for where it says this bot is requesting changes.
-
Click the three dots to the right.
-
Select "Dismiss review".
-
In the text entry box, respond to each of the numbered items in the previous
section, declare one of the following:
-
Done.
-
$REASON_WHY_NO_NEED. E.g. for
unreleased_changelog.md, "No
canister behavior changes.", or for item 2, "Existing APIs
behave as before.".
Brief Guide to "Externally Visible" Changes
"Externally visible behavior change" is very often due to some NEW canister API.
Changes to EXISTING APIs are more likely to be "breaking".
If these changes are breaking, make sure that clients know how to migrate, how to
maintain their continuity of operations.
If your changes are behind a feature flag, then, do NOT add entrie(s) to
unreleased_changelog.md in this PR! But rather, add entrie(s) later, in the PR
that enables these changes in production.
Reference(s)
For a more comprehensive checklist, see here.
GOVERNANCE_CHECKLIST_REMINDER_DEDUP
|
@dfinity/governance-team: There is a comment for updating unreleased_changelog.md, but I don't think my changes affect governance. Any recommendations? |
| let measurement3 = [11, 12, 13, 14, 15]; | ||
| let measurement4 = [16, 17, 18, 19, 20]; // From unblessed version | ||
|
|
||
| let replica_versions_and_records = vec![ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nit: is None a valid (and realistic) value for guest_launch_measurements? If so, could we also add it here?
Number of transitive dependencies before -> after:
attestation: 175 -> 99attestation_testing: 187 -> 101