Skip to content

Conversation

@gouravjshah
Copy link

No description provided.

- Add custom AI review instructions for DevOps focus
- Create Goose workflow for automated PR reviews
- Configure Google Gemini integration
- Add docker-compose.yml with app, Redis, and Nginx services
- Configure Nginx as reverse proxy with health checks
- Include health checks and restart policies
@github-actions
Copy link

🤖 AI Code Review

Automated review by Goose + Google Gemini

logging to /home/runner/.local/share/goose/sessions/20250921_102741.jsonl
working directory: /home/runner/work/tech-stack-advisor/tech-stack-advisor

Okay, I will review the code changes provided, focusing on the key areas you specified.

.github/workflows/goose-pr-review.yml

  • Summary of changes: This file sets up a GitHub Actions workflow to automatically review pull requests using Goose AI and Google Gemini. It checks out the code, gathers PR information (files changed, diff), installs Goose CLI, configures Goose with the Google provider, prepares review instructions, runs the AI review, and posts the review as a comment on the PR.
  • Key observations:
    • The workflow correctly sets up Goose and uses the Google Gemini model for code review.
    • It dynamically generates review instructions by combining a static instruction file with the PR's changes.
    • The workflow filters out irrelevant log messages from the Goose output to create a cleaner PR comment.
    • It uses gh pr comment to post the review, which is a good way to integrate the review into the GitHub UI.
  • Recommendations for improvement:
    • Consider adding error handling to the Goose CLI execution. For example, check the exit code of the goose run command and fail the workflow if it's not zero.
    • The sed commands for filtering Goose output could be simplified or made more robust. Consider using jq for JSON parsing if Goose output becomes more structured.
    • The workflow currently uses a fixed model (gemini-2.0-flash-exp). It might be beneficial to make this configurable via a workflow input or environment variable.
    • The sed 's/[[:space:]]*$//' command is removing trailing whitespace. While generally good practice, ensure this doesn't inadvertently remove significant whitespace in code examples within the review.
  • Security or performance notes:
    • The workflow uses secrets.GOOGLE_API_KEY to securely store the API key.
    • Consider adding a step to check for sensitive information (e.g., API keys, passwords) in the code before running the AI review. Tools like trufflehog can be used for this purpose.

.goose/instructions.txt

  • Summary of changes: This file contains the custom instructions for the Goose AI code review, defining the role of the reviewer (expert DevOps engineer), the key areas of focus, and the desired review format.
  • Key observations:
    • The instructions are well-structured and clearly define the scope of the review.
    • The instructions cover a wide range of important aspects for a machine learning application, including Docker, infrastructure, security, CI/CD, and code quality.
    • The review format is clearly defined, making it easier for the AI to generate consistent and actionable reviews.
  • Recommendations for improvement:
    • Consider adding more specific instructions related to the machine learning application's specific requirements (e.g., data preprocessing, model training, deployment).
    • The instructions could be made more dynamic by using variables or placeholders to insert project-specific information (e.g., the name of the application, the programming languages used).
  • Security or performance notes: N/A

docker-compose.yaml

  • Summary of changes: This file defines a Docker Compose configuration for the machine learning application, including a tech-stack-advisor service (built from the current directory) and an nginx service for reverse proxying.
  • Key observations:
    • The Compose file defines two services: the application itself (tech-stack-advisor) and a reverse proxy (nginx).
    • The application service exposes port 7860, and the reverse proxy exposes port 80.
    • The tech-stack-advisor service includes a health check to ensure the application is running correctly.
    • Both services use restart: unless-stopped to ensure they are automatically restarted if they fail.
  • Recommendations for improvement:
    • Consider using a more specific base image for the tech-stack-advisor service instead of building from the current directory. This can improve build times and reduce image size.
    • The health check for the tech-stack-advisor service could be improved by checking a more specific endpoint that indicates the application is fully ready to handle requests (e.g., an endpoint that checks database connectivity or model loading).
    • Use environment variables for all configurable parameters (ports, timeouts, etc).
  • Security or performance notes:
    • Ensure the tech-stack-advisor service runs as a non-root user inside the container. This can be achieved by adding a USER instruction to the Dockerfile.
    • The Compose file exposes port 80, which is generally acceptable for a web application. However, consider using HTTPS and redirecting HTTP traffic to HTTPS for improved security.

nginx.conf

  • Summary of changes: This file configures the Nginx reverse proxy to forward requests to the tech-stack-advisor service.
  • Key observations:
    • The configuration defines an upstream server named tech_stack_advisor that points to the application service on port 7860.
    • The server block listens on port 80 and forwards all requests to the tech_stack_advisor upstream.
    • The configuration includes a /health endpoint that returns a 200 OK status, which can be used for health checks.
  • Recommendations for improvement:
    • Consider adding caching to the Nginx configuration to improve performance.
    • Implement HTTPS and redirect HTTP traffic to HTTPS for improved security.
    • Add rate limiting to protect the application from abuse.
  • Security or performance notes:
    • The configuration includes proxy_set_header directives to pass the original client IP address to the application. This is important for logging and security purposes.
    • Ensure the Nginx configuration is regularly updated to address any security vulnerabilities.

Overall Assessment:

  • Rate: Good
  • Main strengths:
    • Automated code review workflow with Goose AI and Google Gemini
    • Comprehensive review instructions covering key areas
    • Docker Compose configuration for easy deployment
    • Nginx reverse proxy for improved performance and security
  • Priority improvements:
    • Add error handling to the Goose CLI execution in the workflow.
    • Improve the health check for the tech-stack-advisor service.
    • Ensure the tech-stack-advisor service runs as a non-root user.
    • Implement HTTPS and redirect HTTP traffic to HTTPS.
  • Production readiness assessment: The changes are almost ready for production, but the priority improvements should be addressed first. Specifically, running the application as a non-root user and enabling HTTPS are crucial security considerations.

This review was automatically generated. Use human judgment for final decisions.

@gouravjshah gouravjshah merged commit 14275ce into main Sep 21, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants