Skip to content

Conversation

@pcgeek86
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed changes

  • Adds the flux.max_streams configuration to the Deepgram engine.toml for Helm deployments for Kubernetes clusters

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce to the Deepgram self-hosted resources?
Put an x in the boxes that apply

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation update or tests (if none of the other choices apply)

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
  • I have tested my changes in my local self-hosted environment
    • Please describe your testing setup and methodology here
  • I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate)

Further comments

@pcgeek86 pcgeek86 requested review from a team and therealevanhenry as code owners January 27, 2026 04:55
@jkroll-deepgram
Copy link
Contributor

@pcgeek86 I added one comment. Additionally, to pass CI, please add a line under Unreleased in the changelog (here), something like:

## Unreleased

### Added

- Exposed `flux.max_streams` value for Flux capacity management

Comment on lines +61 to +62
### Specify the maximum number of concurrent streams to the Flux model in the Engine process
# max_streams = 40
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please stub this out for license_proxy_deploy/engine.toml too?

### Enable Flux turn-based streaming STT
[flux]
enabled = false # or true

@bd-g bd-g merged commit 57d3b2c into main Jan 27, 2026
2 checks passed
@bd-g bd-g deleted the 2026-01-26-flux-max-streams branch January 27, 2026 20:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants