SD-2749-Ebl-issuance added reason to root level for error scenario

[palatsangeetha]

PR Type

Enhancement

---

Description

• Add reason field to root level of error response

• Applies to rejection scenarios (BREQ and REFU codes)

• Maintains existing error details in nested structure

---

Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  A["Error Response<br/>BREQ or REFU"] --> B["Root Level<br/>reason field"]
  A --> C["Nested errors<br/>array with reason"]
  B -- "New addition" --> D["Rejection reason"]
  C -- "Existing" --> D

Loading

File Walkthrough

Relevant files

Enhancement

EblIssuancePlatform.java Add root-level reason field for rejection responses            ebl-issuance/src/main/java/org/dcsa/conformance/standards/eblissuance/party/EblIssuancePlatform.java Added reason field at root level of platform response for rejection scenarios Field is populated with "Rejected as required by the conformance scenario" message Applies when response code is BREQ or REFU Complements existing nested error reason field +1/-0

---

[qodo-code-review]

PR Compliance Guide 🔍

Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:

Security Compliance
🟢	No security concerns identified No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.
Ticket Compliance
🟢	🎫 #SD-2749 🟢 When issuanceResponseCode is not ISSU, include a root-level reason field in the response. For the BREQ and REFU conformance scenarios, set the root-level reason to the same value as errors[].reason (copy from errors/reason).
Codebase Duplication Compliance
⚪	Codebase context is not defined Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.
Custom Compliance
🟢	Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis and compliance. Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code self-documenting Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful degradation Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Secure Error Handling Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while providing sufficient detail for internal debugging. Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Secure Logging Practices Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data. Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent vulnerabilities Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Compliance status legend

🟢 - Fully Compliant
🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label

[qodo-code-review]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Impact
General	Extract duplicated strings into constants Extract the duplicated string literal "Rejected as required by the conformance scenario" and the hardcoded error code "DCSA-123" into private static final constants to improve maintainability. ebl-issuance/src/main/java/org/dcsa/conformance/standards/eblissuance/party/EblIssuancePlatform.java [191-198] +private static final String REJECTION_REASON = "Rejected as required by the conformance scenario"; +private static final String CONFORMANCE_ERROR_CODE = "DCSA-123"; +... if (scenarioResponseCode.equals("BREQ") || scenarioResponseCode.equals("REFU")) { - platformResponse.put("reason", "Rejected as required by the conformance scenario"); + platformResponse.put("reason", REJECTION_REASON); platformResponse .putArray("errors") .addObject() - .put("reason", "Rejected as required by the conformance scenario") - .put("errorCode", "DCSA-123"); + .put("reason", REJECTION_REASON) + .put("errorCode", CONFORMANCE_ERROR_CODE); } [To ensure code accuracy, apply this suggestion manually] Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 __ Why: The suggestion correctly identifies duplicated string literals, one of which was introduced in the PR, and proposes extracting them into constants, which improves code maintainability.	Low
	Use a Set for condition checking Replace the || condition with Set.of("BREQ", "REFU").contains(scenarioResponseCode) for improved readability and scalability when checking for rejection codes. ebl-issuance/src/main/java/org/dcsa/conformance/standards/eblissuance/party/EblIssuancePlatform.java [191-198] -if (scenarioResponseCode.equals("BREQ") || scenarioResponseCode.equals("REFU")) { +if (Set.of("BREQ", "REFU").contains(scenarioResponseCode)) { platformResponse.put("reason", "Rejected as required by the conformance scenario"); platformResponse .putArray("errors") .addObject() .put("reason", "Rejected as required by the conformance scenario") .put("errorCode", "DCSA-123"); } Apply / Chat Suggestion importance[1-10]: 3 __ Why: This is a valid stylistic suggestion that can improve readability, but for only two conditions, the original || check is also clear and the suggested change offers only a marginal improvement.	Low
More