Conversation
This file should not live on this branch. Signed-off-by: Tom Daly <tjd@datum.net>
joshlreese
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good! I came across a handful of typos while reviewing and recommended some fixes.
Only remaining comment is regarding line length, which I mentioned in #55 (review) as well.
mksinghtx
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As per our discussion on slack I have added attachments to the issues and we can take a look and reconcile and review at next iteration.
Co-authored-by: Joshua Reese <joshlreese@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Daly <tjd@q7.io>
Co-authored-by: Joshua Reese <joshlreese@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Daly <tjd@q7.io>
Rewrapped to 80 columns as requested. |
ecv
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm fine with this landing actually. @datum-cloud/engineering RFC
|
This feels like something that should go in our handbook on datum.net. Not something that should go in our enhancements repo. Thoughts @drewr / @jacobsmith928 / @mksinghtx ? |
jacobsmith928
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is good to go, time to make it reality @ecv !
|
@scotwells yeah we have our policies here: |
|
@jacobsmith928 so you agree we can just close this and let the content live in the handbook? |
|
Yup
…On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 10:53 AM Scot Schuchert-Wells < ***@***.***> wrote:
*scotwells* left a comment (datum-cloud/enhancements#61)
<#61 (comment)>
@jacobsmith928 <https://github.com/jacobsmith928> so you agree we can
just close this and let the content live in the handbook?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#61 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB46TKOOABOWR4BZIFVVC4D4LH5EXAVCNFSM6AAAAACTO5P77WVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTQNZYG43TQMBVGQ>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Initial draft our our security and trust promise.