Boolean comparison

[roxblnfk]

Continue #230

In cases where the field size is unknown but we are comparing with a bool, we adjust the field size to 1.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.42%. Comparing base (f8b3a87) to head (28128ac).
Report is 1 commits behind head on 2.x.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                2.x     #234      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     95.41%   95.42%   +0.01%     
- Complexity     1891     1896       +5     
============================================
  Files           131      131              
  Lines          5273     5285      +12     
============================================
+ Hits           5031     5043      +12     
  Misses          242      242              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[roxblnfk]

@puzzledpolymath WDYT about this approach?

[puzzledpolymath]

@roxblnfk While seemingly more complex, your solution is better.

I wasn't aware of this and completely bypassed the comment.

// since 8.0 database does not provide size for some columns

I've tested locally and you're changes have the same affect. You have my approval 🥇

Looking forward to this getting resolved finally and a 2.14 release out the door. I have some code partially written for ULID support and am keen to move onto Snowflake identifiers which will not be as straight-forward.

[puzzledpolymath]

Looks great, appreciate the time and effort