Skip to content

Conversation

@bgoncal
Copy link

@bgoncal bgoncal commented Dec 21, 2025

Fix issue #12

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Changes
    • Charge token creation now accepts an optional name field, reducing required input parameters.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 21, 2025

Walkthrough

The name field in the ChargeToken model class is updated from a required string to an optional string type with a None default value, allowing instances to be created without specifying a name.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Type signature update
shellrecharge/usermodels.py
Changed ChargeToken.name field from str to `str

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • Single type annotation change on one model field
  • No logic modifications or control flow changes
  • Verify that downstream code handling ChargeToken.name correctly accounts for None values

Poem

🐰 A name that's optional now, how neat!
The field bows gracefully with default None,
No longer required to complete the beat,
Flexibility in tokens—a job well done! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: making the name field optional in ChargeToken model by adding a Union type and default value.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
shellrecharge/usermodels.py (1)

20-20: LGTM! Field is now correctly optional.

The change properly makes the name field optional by allowing None values with a default.

Refactor for consistency: Use Optional[str] instead of str | None.

The file consistently uses Optional[T] syntax throughout (lines 26-27, 80-82, 106, 118). For uniformity, use Optional[str] = None instead of str | None = None:

-    name: str | None = None
+    name: Optional[str] = None
📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e7297b4 and a53096a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • shellrecharge/usermodels.py (1 hunks)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant