Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several updates across the module. The example value for the 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #366 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 16 16
Lines 1285 1288 +3
=========================================
+ Hits 1285 1288 +3
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
cuenca_validations/types/identities.py (1)
187-189: Consider adding hash algorithm information.The
hashfield could benefit from additional validation and documentation about the expected hash algorithm and format.Consider updating the field definition to include this information:
hash: str = Field( - description="hash of the signature" + description="SHA-256 hash of the signature image", + min_length=64, + max_length=64, + pattern=r'^[a-f0-9]{64}$' )🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: test
[warning] 189-189: trailing whitespace
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
cuenca_validations/types/__init__.py(2 hunks)cuenca_validations/types/identities.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: test
cuenca_validations/types/identities.py
[warning] 189-189: trailing whitespace
🔇 Additional comments (2)
cuenca_validations/types/__init__.py (1)
77-77: LGTM!The addition of
Signatureto the__all__list and its import from.identitiesfollow the existing patterns and maintain alphabetical ordering.Also applies to: 171-171
cuenca_validations/types/identities.py (1)
177-199: LGTM!The
Signatureclass is well-structured and follows the established patterns in the codebase:
- Inherits from
BaseModel- Uses appropriate field types (
strfor uri/location/hash,IPvAnyAddressfor ip)- Includes clear field descriptions
- Provides a helpful example schema
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: test
[warning] 189-189: trailing whitespace
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
cuenca_validations/types/requests.py (1)
626-629: Add JSON schema example and field descriptions.To maintain consistency with other request models in the codebase, consider adding:
- Field descriptions using
Field(description="...").- JSON schema example using
model_config.class SignatureRequest(BaseRequest): - signature: Signature - user_id: str + signature: Signature = Field( + description="Signature details including URI, location, IP, and hash" + ) + user_id: str = Field(description="ID of the user providing the signature") + model_config = ConfigDict( + json_schema_extra={ + 'example': { + 'signature': { + 'uri': 'https://example.com/signatures/123', + 'location': 'Mexico City, MX', + 'ip': '192.168.1.1', + 'hash': 'abc123' + }, + 'user_id': 'USWqY5cvkISJOxHyEKjAKf8w' + } + } + )🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: test
[warning] 626-626: E302 expected 2 blank lines, found 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
cuenca_validations/types/__init__.py(3 hunks)cuenca_validations/types/requests.py(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- cuenca_validations/types/init.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: test
cuenca_validations/types/requests.py
[warning] 626-626: E302 expected 2 blank lines, found 1
🔇 Additional comments (1)
cuenca_validations/types/requests.py (1)
36-36: LGTM!The
Signatureimport is correctly placed in alphabetical order within the existing import group.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
cuenca_validations/types/identities.py(1 hunks)cuenca_validations/version.py(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- cuenca_validations/version.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: test
cuenca_validations/types/identities.py
[warning] 193-193: W292 no newline at end of file
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: pytest (3.13)
- GitHub Check: pytest (3.10)
- GitHub Check: coverage
- GitHub Check: publish-pypi
2 participants
closes #367
Summary by CodeRabbit