Correct description of libcrux as written in Rust#1337
Merged
jschneider-bensch merged 1 commit intomainfrom Feb 18, 2026
Merged
Correct description of libcrux as written in Rust#1337jschneider-bensch merged 1 commit intomainfrom
jschneider-bensch merged 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
Contributor
karthikbhargavan
left a comment
karthikbhargavan
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Shall we say a bit more about the repository also containing rust wrappers around c and assembly for legacy or testing reasons but that code is being phased out over time? Or am I misunderstanding something?
Contributor
|
Ah just saw your other comment. All good, thanks. |
Collaborator
Author
|
I hope we can merge #1259 soon, for which we'll have to update the main README again, in any case. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Until we've merged #1259 this part of the README is not accurate.