Add Recursive Depth check

[john-twigg-ck]

We had our call stack blowing up regularly.
Add a new Dip Error and reporting to help identify recursive errors.

It can print out a report like the following:

Recursive Depth exceeded: Cycle Found: [DipTests.RecusiveTests.(unknown context at $106ad07f8).ServiceA, DipTests.RecusiveTests.(unknown context at $106ad0758).ServiceB, DipTests.RecusiveTests.(unknown context at $106ad06b8).ServiceC]

The Max is defaulted to 100. Can be configured statically.

[DulMephistos]

styling:

var cycleSubStack: [Any.Type] = []
var hitCount: [String:Int] = []

[john-twigg-ck]

?? I'm not aware of us having a preference on this one.
Its not like we do
let foo: Foo = Foo() either...

[DulMephistos]

well, it's confusing but we do reference two style guides in our docs unfortunately. One of them is more kept up to date and more comprehensive. That one says that for empty arrays / dictionaries, we should inform the type and initialize with the short form, which is either [] or [:]

ref: https://github.com/ck-private/mob_ios/blob/stable/Documentation/Styleguide/STYLEGUIDE.md#type-annotation-for-empty-arrays-and-dictionaries

[DulMephistos]

All minor stuff .. great change John, this will help a lot!