-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 139
Implement proposed k8s-stream-file format
#265
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
portante
wants to merge
1
commit into
containers:main
Choose a base branch
from
portante:stream_log_writer
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(A drive-by comment with little context:)
If the goal is to offload the CPU processing to consumers, shouldn’t this just be a timestamp instead of all the timezone lookups and formatting?
Either way, UTC would be better than ambiguous local time — does this one need custom parser code to get a
struct timespecback?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The problem here is establishing a reference point for what the timestamp "means".
First, for efficiency, a simple monotonically incremental timestamp is all that is needed, along with a periodic mapping of that timestamp to a real clock. This format could be modified to periodically emit (once a second? once every 5 seconds?) an entry for that mapping: <monotonic stamp, realtime stamp>
That realtime stamp would be emitted using UTC instead of the local timezone. All logs after would calculate the real timestamp from that that offset.
If that makes sense, we can implement this instead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I should add that the goal is to push the details of interpreting the log stream to the reader and not on
conmonthe writer.