Skip to content

docs: fix typo in verify function#4

Open
CanRau wants to merge 1 commit intocoji:mainfrom
CanRau:patch-1
Open

docs: fix typo in verify function#4
CanRau wants to merge 1 commit intocoji:mainfrom
CanRau:patch-1

Conversation

@CanRau
Copy link

@CanRau CanRau commented Feb 5, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Updated GoogleStrategy callback parameter signature. Applications using GoogleStrategy authentication may require updates to their implementation to accommodate the revised parameter structure.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 5, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The GoogleStrategy callback function signature in the documentation has been updated, changing the first parameter from accessToken to request while retaining tokens. The internal implementation continues to use tokens for fetching user profiles, though the new parameter addition reflects interface changes requiring potential caller updates.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
GoogleStrategy Callback Documentation
README.md
Updated callback signature from async ({ accessToken, tokens }) to async ({ request, tokens }), replacing the explicit accessToken parameter with a request object while maintaining tokens-based functionality.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

Poem

🐰 A token, a request, dancing in the night,
The callback takes a bow, shifting left and right,
Google's strategy waltz, evolving with grace,
The signature twirls, revealing a new face! 🌙✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ⚠️ Warning The title claims to fix a typo in a verify function, but the actual change modifies the GoogleStrategy callback signature from async ({ accessToken, tokens }) to async ({ request, tokens }), which is a functional change to the callback parameters, not a typo fix. Update the title to accurately describe the change, such as 'refactor: update GoogleStrategy callback signature to use request parameter' or similar.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant