Skip to content

Conversation

@edcalderon
Copy link

@edcalderon edcalderon commented Aug 4, 2025

Description

Tests

Checklist

  • I have formatted and linted my code
  • All new and existing tests pass
  • My commits are signed (required for merge)

@cb-heimdall
Copy link

cb-heimdall commented Aug 4, 2025

🟡 Heimdall Review Status

Requirement Status More Info
Reviews 🟡 0/1
Denominator calculation
Show calculation
1 if user is bot 0
1 if user is external 0
2 if repo is sensitive 0
From .codeflow.yml 1
Additional review requirements
Show calculation
Max 0
0
From CODEOWNERS 0
Global minimum 0
Max 1
1
1 if commit is unverified 1
Sum 2

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 4, 2025

@edcalderon is attempting to deploy a commit to the Coinbase Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@edcalderon
Copy link
Author

added:

New Scheme Variant: Added avm-exact alongside the basic avm scheme
Authorization Flow:
Clients sign payment authorizations with specific parameters
Servers verify both the transaction and its authorization
Includes nonce-based replay protection
Key Features:
Supports both ALGO and ASA transfers
Includes validity windows using Algorand's round numbers
Maintains atomicity guarantees
Prevents replay attacks with unique nonces
Security Enhancements:
Signature verification of payment details
Nonce tracking to prevent reuse
Explicit validation of payment amounts and recipients
Looking forward to the implementation following Algorand's best practices while maintaining compatibility with the x402 protocol's security model.

@phdargen
Copy link
Contributor

phdargen commented Jan 2, 2026

Thanks for your proposal @edcalderon, closing this in favor of #361. Your feedback on #361 would be much appreciated, thanks for your understanding

@phdargen phdargen closed this Jan 2, 2026
@edcalderon
Copy link
Author

Great, thanks for the update @phdargen — really appreciate the update 🙌

That makes sense to consolidate under #361. I’ll move the discussion there and share my feedback on the updated proposal.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants