Add whaddayamean.json with gibberish content

[DanielOrge]

Get checks to implement branch protection with merge queues

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
Report missing for faa211c1	✅ ∅ (target: 70.00%)

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (faa211c)	Report Missing	Report Missing	Report Missing
Head commit (8208ee3)	30	25	83.33%

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#6)	0	0	∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Footnotes

1. Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct. ↩

[codacy-production]

❌ Codacy found a critical Security issue: Possible hardcoded secret: Slack token

The issue identified by the Trivy linter is that the Slack token is hardcoded directly in the source code. Hardcoding sensitive information like API tokens, passwords, or secret keys poses a significant security risk, as it can lead to accidental exposure if the code is shared, versioned in a public repository, or otherwise accessed by unauthorized individuals.

To mitigate this risk, the best practice is to store sensitive information in environment variables or secure configuration files that are not included in version control. This way, the secrets can be managed securely and accessed at runtime without being hardcoded in the source code.

Here's a code suggestion to fix the issue by retrieving the Slack token from an environment variable instead:

Suggested change

	slack_token = "xoxb-123456789012-1234567890123-abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwx"
	slack_token = os.getenv("SLACK_TOKEN")

Make sure to also set the environment variable SLACK_TOKEN in your deployment environment to the actual token value.

---

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

[codacy-production]

🚫 Codacy found a high Security issue: Possible hardcoded password: 'xoxb-123456789012-1234567890123-abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwx'

The issue identified by the Bandit linter is that the Slack token is hardcoded directly in the source code. Hardcoding sensitive information like API tokens, passwords, or secret keys poses a security risk, as it can be easily exposed if the code is shared or published. Instead, sensitive information should be stored securely and accessed in a way that does not expose it in the codebase.

A common practice to address this issue is to use environment variables to store sensitive information. This allows the application to retrieve the token at runtime without hardcoding it into the source code.

Here's a code suggestion to fix the issue by using an environment variable:

Suggested change

	slack_token = "xoxb-123456789012-1234567890123-abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwx"
	slack_token = os.getenv("SLACK_TOKEN")

Ensure that the environment variable SLACK_TOKEN is set in your environment before running the application.

---

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.