Codev 2.0? #158
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
I’m fully on board with the first point. Making the framework itself enforce protocols (rather than relying just on the agent) feels like an essential feature to me. but maybe also leaving room for protocol-free engagement as well. I have also been thinking lately about a 'smooth' way for users to define their own protocols. I don't want to suggest something clumsy; but maybe there could be a standard 'recipe' for adding a new protocol?
On a practical note: being able to run several architects simultaneously for different repos would be huge. A typical workday for me involves juggling two repos at once (and the crazy days involve 3 or 4), so concurrency support is high on my wish list. One last small thought: could |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I'm starting to think about Codev 2.0. Here are my initial thoughts. What do you all think?
Thoughts?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions