Skip to content

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

πŸ’‘ What: Refactored SatcomForecastCoordinator to process GPS request messages concurrently instead of sequentially.
🎯 Why: The original implementation processed messages one by one. Since each message involves network I/O (fetching NWS forecast) and SMTP I/O (sending email), sequential processing adds up latency. Parallelizing these operations significantly reduces the total time for a polling cycle when multiple requests are pending.
πŸ“Š Impact: Reduces total processing time roughly to max(time_per_message) instead of sum(time_per_message) for a batch of messages.
πŸ”¬ Measurement: Verify by sending multiple GPS requests to the monitored inbox and observing the logs; processing should start for all messages almost simultaneously. Verified existing tests pass.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 7959835161814093715 started by @clayauld

Refactors `SatcomForecastCoordinator._async_update_data` to process messages concurrently using `asyncio.gather`. This reduces the total update time when multiple messages are present, as forecast fetching and email sending are IO-bound operations.

- Extracts message processing logic to `_process_message`.
- Uses `asyncio.gather` to execute tasks in parallel.
- Preserves existing error handling and logging.
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor Author

πŸ‘‹ Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a πŸ‘€ emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

@github-actions
Copy link

πŸ“Š Pull Request Analysis Report

πŸ§ͺ Test Results

Metric Value
Total Tests 244
βœ… Passed 244
❌ Failed 0
⏭️ Skipped 0
πŸ’₯ Errors 0
πŸ“ˆ Success Rate 100.0%

πŸ“‹ Coverage Report

Metric Value
Overall Coverage 81.4%
Total Lines 2794
Covered Lines 2273
Missing Lines 521

πŸ“ File Coverage Breakdown

  • __init__.py: 86.0%
  • api_cache.py: 83.5%
  • api_client.py: 84.5%
  • api_config.py: 75.2%
  • api_data_processor.py: 80.0%
  • api_error_handler.py: 88.9%
  • api_formatter.py: 94.7%
  • api_models.py: 94.7%
  • config_flow.py: 68.5%
  • const.py: 100.0%

🎯 Recommendations


πŸ“Š Analysis generated by GitHub Actions β€’ View detailed test report

@github-actions
Copy link

πŸ€– Automated Code Review

πŸ§ͺ Test Results

βœ… All tests passed! Your changes don't break any existing functionality.

πŸ” Linting Results Summary

βœ… Black (Code Formatting) - PASSED

βœ… Flake8 (Code Quality) - PASSED

βœ… isort (Import Sorting) - PASSED

⚠️ MyPy (Type Checking)

custom_components/satcom_forecast/config_flow.py:212: error: Unused "type: ignore" comment  [unused-ignore]
custom_components/satcom_forecast/config_flow.py:212: error: Untyped decorator makes function "async_get_options_flow" untyped  [untyped-decorator]
custom_components/satcom_forecast/config_flow.py:212: note: Error code "untyped-decorator" not covered by "type: ignore" comment

Fix: Add missing type annotations and fix type errors. Common fixes:

  • Add return type annotations: def function() -> ReturnType:
  • Add parameter type hints: def function(param: ParamType):
  • Import needed types: from typing import List, Dict, Optional

βœ… Bandit (Security) - PASSED

βœ… All Linting Checks Passed!

Great job! Your code meets all the linting standards.


This comment was automatically generated by GitHub Actions. Check the Actions tab for detailed logs.

@clayauld clayauld marked this pull request as ready for review December 20, 2025 01:28
@clayauld clayauld merged commit 96440a1 into main Dec 20, 2025
9 checks passed
@clayauld clayauld deleted the bolt-concurrent-message-processing-7959835161814093715 branch December 20, 2025 01:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant