Bump handlebars from 4.7.6 to 4.7.7

[dependabot]

Bumps handlebars from 4.7.6 to 4.7.7.

Changelog

Sourced from handlebars's changelog.

v4.7.7 - February 15th, 2021

• fix weird error in integration tests - eb860c0
• fix: check prototype property access in strict-mode (#1736) - b6d3de7
• fix: escape property names in compat mode (#1736) - f058970
• refactor: In spec tests, use expectTemplate over equals and shouldThrow (#1683) - 77825f8
• chore: start testing on Node.js 12 and 13 - 3789a30

(POSSIBLY) BREAKING CHANGES:

• the changes from version 4.6.0 now also apply in when using the compile-option "strict: true". Access to prototype properties is forbidden completely by default, specific properties or methods can be allowed via runtime-options. See #1633 for details. If you are using Handlebars as documented, you should not be accessing prototype properties from your template anyway, so the changes should not be a problem for you. Only the use of undocumented features can break your build.

That is why we only bump the patch version despite mentioning breaking changes.

Commits

Commits

• a9a8e40 v4.7.7
• e66aed5 Update release notes
• 7d4d170 disable IE in Saucelabs tests
• eb860c0 fix weird error in integration tests
• b6d3de7 fix: check prototype property access in strict-mode (#1736)
• f058970 fix: escape property names in compat mode (#1736)
• 77825f8 refator: In spec tests, use expectTemplate over equals and shouldThrow (#1683)
• 3789a30 chore: start testing on Node.js 12 and 13
• See full diff in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
• @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
• @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot use these labels will set the current labels as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
• @dependabot use these reviewers will set the current reviewers as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
• @dependabot use these assignees will set the current assignees as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
• @dependabot use this milestone will set the current milestone as the default for future PRs for this repo and language

You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the Security Alerts page.

[elgreg]

@macgyver Do you have permissions to merge this? It would resolve some security issues, but they also mention a breaking change

[macgyver]

I do have permission to merge this, but I don't know how to publish a release to npm ... i may or may not have permission to do that. I wouldn't discount the possibility that the breaking change applies to us, but it does seem rather unlikely.

Regardless, if I am not mistaken, the process of integrating a new version of handlebars into clay is a painful one - the version in clay-kiln needs to match the version in our local repo and possibly other repos.. it's been a few years since we did one of these so we'll need to experiment a bit with it I think... we may want to try this locally before merging PRs.

what do you think? I bet we could get through it in a morning if we paired up on it.

[elgreg]

@macgyver In that case it probably makes more sense to pair up with some folks from other orgs. Maybe we bring up in the 1pm?

[macgyver]

oh ya good idea, although I don't think our next scheduled one is until April ...