Conversation
dariothuerkauf
left a comment
dariothuerkauf
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I really like how you managed to build upon parts from previous lectures and extend them reasonably to get a profound understanding of Transaction Malleability and SegWit!
| \end{figure} | ||
| \vspace{1em} | ||
|
|
||
| \uncover<2->{$\rightarrow$ The \texttt{scriptSig} is part of the transaction data and cannot be signed (self-referential).} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| \uncover<2->{$\rightarrow$ The \texttt{scriptSig} is part of the transaction data and cannot be signed (self-referential).} | |
| \uncover<2->{$\rightarrow$ The signature is part of the \texttt{scriptSig} and cannot sign itself (self-referential).} |
| \end{scriptsize} | ||
| \vspace{1em} | ||
| To the alternative:\\ | ||
| \begin{scriptsize} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Mark 4d separately as OP_PUSHDATA2 ?
| %%% | ||
|
|
||
| %%% | ||
| \begin{frame}{P2SH Embedded SegWit Transactions} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This slide is not that intuitive, but probably will be clear if presented in the video.
| \begin{column}{0.5\textwidth} | ||
| \uncover<3->{ | ||
| \begin{align*} | ||
| W &= 3 \cdot (1 - \beta) bs(\texttt{all})\\ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add an explanation what "Beta" and "bs" is?
I think the derivation of the formula is not necessary but I don't understand how the "+1" occurs in the second line.
schaer-unibas
left a comment
schaer-unibas
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you @golmit! What a fantastic slide deck! I particularly enjoyed the things you added in addition to the book and the callbacks to the earlier slide decks (forks, ECDSA and transaction example). Only very minor inputs. -> Approved.
3 participants
Description
First version of the "SegWit and Transaction Malleability" slides.
Type of Change
Checklist: