-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 125
fix: correct the value of additional_properties in the action meta in Juju 4
#2250
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
tonyandrewmeyer
wants to merge
2
commits into
canonical:main
Choose a base branch
from
tonyandrewmeyer:fix-additionalProperties-default-flip
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Significantly, it seems like this is the first thing we have under
CharmMetathat actually depends on the Juju context, rather than being purely derived from the charm's YAML files.I wonder if it would be cleaner to update
ActionMetaandCharmMetato take aJujuContext. This would have to be optional, since the constructors are public, and I guess the default behaviour if the context isn't provided would still have to be loading it from the environment. And if we want this to continue to work outside a real Juju context, we'd still need to provide a default value forJUJU_VERSION(among others), sinceJujuContext.from_environwill error if it isn't set.This seems like more trouble than it would be worth right now, so I guess just checking the version is the right call, even if it feels a little bit messy.
It does seem like a shame to essentially reimplement the deprecated
JujuVersion.from_environhere. WDYT about moving the logic to a privateJujuVersion._from_environmethod and calling that here? Maybe it's simple enough that it's not worth it, but it could be tidier if we end up needing to do more of this in future.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, that's basically what I said in the PR description 😉.
I'm not sure it's worth it for a single line. I guess there is the
JUJU_VERSIONconstant and the weird "use 0.0.0 if not present" default, but I'm not sure those merit avoiding duplicating it.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just reproducing your working.
Yeah, I'm on the fence -- I think it's more worth it for the
0.0.0default thanJUJU_VERSION, but probably fine either way.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Based on a quick scan around the code, it seems that using
0.0.0by default is an established pattern. So keeping the logic here seems fine to me (but I'd also be fine either way).