Skip to content
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
15 changes: 0 additions & 15 deletions project-repo/review-process.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -31,21 +31,6 @@ We should use the **merge commit workflow** (not squash and merge). The history

Individual commits do not follow [conventional commits][convcommits] and are free form. However, for better readability of the mainline, the merge commit in the mainline should follow [conventional commits][convcommits].

For this, the PR title should be of the form: `<type>(<scope>): <subject>`. The scope is optional. The first comment will be the commit body and needs to reference any associated JIRA card on the last line, separated by a blank line.

The accepted `types` are:

* `build`: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies
* `ci`: Changes to the CI configuration
* `deps`: Update dependencies
* `docs`: Documentation only changes
* `feat`: A new feature
* `fix`: A bug fix
* `maint`: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-spaces, formatting, missing semi-colons, typo fixes, etc). Gardening…
* `perf`: A code change that improves performance
* `refactor`: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature (nor add bugs)!
* `tests`: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests

> TODO: have a document defining what to configure in every new GitHub project (webhook for Jira, merge commit + default commit template, automated merged branch deletion).

## Process
Expand Down