Skip to content

Conversation

@gmgunter
Copy link
Contributor

Let me know if you have different style preferences. Just getting the ball rolling.

@gmgunter gmgunter requested review from aivazis and r-burns December 25, 2020 00:07
Comment on lines +29 to +31
AlwaysBreakAfterReturnType: All
ConstructorInitializerAllOnOneLineOrOnePerLine: true
BinPackParameters: false
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is probably the biggest divergence from isce3. I think I tend to prefer to use more vertical space than you guys do. Feel free to veto ;)

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

that's very close to what i normally do, with one base class constructor per line, followed by one data member per line. the only difference is that i break them out this way even if they would fit. so this is just fine with me

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I prefer this actually, if the parameters are filling up too much vertical space, that's a cue to merge some of them into structs/tuples :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants