Skip to content

Added codeowners file#79

Open
wehappyfew wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
feat/codeowners
Open

Added codeowners file#79
wehappyfew wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
feat/codeowners

Conversation

@wehappyfew
Copy link

No description provided.

justinbarry and others added 3 commits September 25, 2025 15:41
Signed-off-by: Justin <328965+justinbarry@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@ash-burnt ash-burnt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Apparently the file has errors

@crucible-burnt
Copy link
Contributor

🔍 Crucible Security Review (Test)

Testing review posting capability.

Status: Pending review of security patterns.

@crucible-burnt
Copy link
Contributor

🔍 Crucible Security Review

Summary

Adds GitHub CODEOWNERS file for automated code review routing. Routes all contract files to Burnt_Engineering/Burnt_Contracts team and .github/ to DevOps team.

Security Assessment

  • Risk Level: None (infrastructure/metadata only)
  • Does not affect contract security
  • Properly routes reviews to appropriate teams

Code Quality

  • Good practice for PR management
  • Clear team ownership definition

Recommendation

Approve - Administrative change with no security implications

Copy link
Contributor

@crucible-burnt crucible-burnt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔍 Crucible Security Review

Summary

Minor repo configuration change adding CODEOWNERS file.

Security Assessment

  • Risk Level: Clean
  • No code changes, just ownership configuration

Immunefi Pattern Check

  • N/A - No executable code changes

False Report Risk

  • None identified

Code Quality Notes

  • Standard CODEOWNERS format
  • Good practice for review requirements

Status

✅ No security concerns. Purely administrative change.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants